David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 46 (3):439-458 (1979)
Wesley C. Salmon (1977) has written a characteristically elegant and ingenious paper 'The Curvature of Physical Space'. He argues in it that the curvature of a space cannot be intrinsic to it. Salmon relates his view that space is affinely amorphous to Grunbaum's view (Grunbaum 1973, esp. Ch. 16 & 22) that it is metrically amorphous and acknowledges parallels between the arguments which have been offered for each opinion. I wish to dispute these conclusions on philosophical grounds quite as much as on geometrical ones. Although I concentrate most on arguing for a well defined, intrinsic affinity for physical space the arguments extend easily to support a well defined, intrinsic metric
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Patrick Suppes (1973). Space, Time and Geometry. Boston,Reidel.
Massimo Pauri & Michele Vallisneri, Ephemeral Point-Events: Is There a Last Remnant of Physical Objectivity ?
Roger Harris (2010). Do Material Things Have Intrinsic Properties? Metaphysica 11 (2):105-117.
Martin Carrier, Physical Force of Geometrical Curvature? Einstein, Grünbaum, and the Measurability of Physical Geometry.
Gerald J. Massey (1969). Toward a Clarification of Grünbaum's Conception of an Intrinsic Metric. Philosophy of Science 36 (4):331-345.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #104,242 of 1,102,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,785 of 1,102,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?