Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 46 (3):439-458 (1979)
|Abstract||Wesley C. Salmon (1977) has written a characteristically elegant and ingenious paper 'The Curvature of Physical Space'. He argues in it that the curvature of a space cannot be intrinsic to it. Salmon relates his view that space is affinely amorphous to Grunbaum's view (Grunbaum 1973, esp. Ch. 16 & 22) that it is metrically amorphous and acknowledges parallels between the arguments which have been offered for each opinion. I wish to dispute these conclusions on philosophical grounds quite as much as on geometrical ones. Although I concentrate most on arguing for a well defined, intrinsic affinity for physical space the arguments extend easily to support a well defined, intrinsic metric|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Martin Carrier, Physical Force of Geometrical Curvature? Einstein, Grünbaum, and the Measurability of Physical Geometry.
Roger Harris (2010). Do Material Things Have Intrinsic Properties? Metaphysica 11 (2):105-117.
Massimo Pauri & Michele Vallisneri, Ephemeral Point-Events: Is There a Last Remnant of Physical Objectivity ?
Patrick Suppes (1973). Space, Time and Geometry. Boston,Reidel.
Gerald J. Massey (1969). Toward a Clarification of Grünbaum's Conception of an Intrinsic Metric. Philosophy of Science 36 (4):331-345.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,209 of 735,012 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,269 of 735,012 )
How can I increase my downloads?