David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Analysis 68 (299):205–215 (2008)
I question Brentano's thesis that all and only mental phenomena are intentional. The common gloss on intentionality in terms of directedness does not justify the claim that intentionality is sufficient for mentality. One response to this problem is to lay down further requirements for intentionality. For example, it may be said that we have intentionality only where we have such phenomena as failure of substitution or existential presupposition. I consider a variety of such requirements for intentionality. I argue they either fail to exclude all non-mental phenomena or are so demanding that they ground new, serious challenges to the claim that qualitative states of mind are intentional.
|Keywords||Mark of the mental Intentionality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David M. Braun (1998). Understanding Belief Reports. Philosophical Review 107 (4):555-595.
Tim Crane (2001). Elements of Mind: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Fred Dretske (1989). Reasons and Causes. Philosophical Perspectives 3:1-15.
Fred Dretske (1969). Seeing And Knowing. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Tim Crane (2008). Reply to Nes. Analysis 68 (299):215–218.
Similar books and articles
Ansgar Beckermann (1996). Is There a Problem About Intentionality? Erkenntnis 45 (1):1-24.
T. Crane (forthcoming). Intentionality. Philosophical Explorations.
Stephen F. Barker (1982). Intensionality and Intentionality. Philosophy Research Archives 8:95-109.
Tim Crane (1998). Intentionality as the Mark of the Mental. In , Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge University Press. 229-251.
Gyula Klima (2013). Three Myths of Intentionality Versus Some Medieval Philosophers. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21:359-376.
Pierre le Morvan (2005). Intentionality: Transparent, Translucent, and Opaque. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:283-302.
John J. Haldane (1992). An Embarrassing Question About Reproduction. Philosophical Psychology 5 (4):427-431.
Richard Menary (2009). Intentionality, Cognitive Integration and the Continuity Thesis. Topoi 28 (1):31-43.
Terence Horgan & John Tienson (2002). The Intentionality of Phenomenology and the Phenomenology of Intentionality. In David J. Chalmers (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oup Usa. 520--533.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads72 ( #24,790 of 1,689,878 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #29,630 of 1,689,878 )
How can I increase my downloads?