Mature Human Knowledge as a Standing in the Space of Reasons

Philosophical Topics 37 (1):115-132 (2009)
This quoted passage makes a negative claim – a claim about what we are not doing when we characterize an episode or state as that of knowing – and it also makes a positive claim – a claim about what we are doing when we characterize an episode or state as that of knowing. Although McDowell has not endorsed the negative claim, he has repeatedly and explicitly endorsed the positive claim, i.e., that “in characterizing an episode or a state as that of knowing… we are placing it in the logical space of reasons, of justifying and being able to justify what one says.” This is what I will henceforth call “the positive Sellarsian claim”.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/philtopics200937119
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,664
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Kegan J. Shaw (2016). Religious Epistemological Disjunctivism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (3):261-279.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

35 ( #135,918 of 1,902,892 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #324,369 of 1,902,892 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.