Persuasive Argumentation Versus Manipulation
Argumentation 26 (1):55-69 (2012)
| Abstract | This article deals with the relationship between argumentation and persuasion. It defends the idea that these two concepts are not as opposed as all too often said. If it is important to recognize their differences (there are argumentative discourses without persuasion and persuasive discourses without argumentation), there is nevertheless an overlap, in which characteristics are taken from both. We propose to call this overlap “persuasive argumentation”. In order to bridge argumentation and persuasion, we will first distinguish the latter from manipulation. In the second part of this article, we will analyze four cases of persuasive argumentation: the enthymeme, a few rhetorical figures, narration and visual argumentation | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRaphaël Micheli (2012). Arguing Without Trying to Persuade? Elements for a Non-Persuasive Definition of Argumentation. Argumentation 26 (1):115-126.
Lilian Bermejo-Luque (2010). Intrinsic Versus Instrumental Values of Argumentation: The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation. Argumentation 24 (4):453-474.
Peter Jan Schellens & Menno de Jong (2004). Argumentation Schemes in Persuasive Brochures. Argumentation 18 (3):295-323.
Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton (2008). The Argumentative Structure of Persuasive Definitions. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (5):525 - 549.
J. Anthony Blair (2012). Argumentation as Rational Persuasion. Argumentation 26 (1):71-81.
Daniel J. O.’Keefe (2012). Conviction, Persuasion, and Argumentation: Untangling the Ends and Means of Influence. Argumentation 26 (1):19-32.
Christian Plantin (2012). Persuasion or Alignment? Argumentation 26 (1):83-97.
Marianne Doury (2012). Preaching to the Converted. Why Argue When Everyone Agrees? Argumentation 26 (1):99-114.
Fred J. Kauffeld (1998). Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing. Argumentation 12 (2):245-266.
Beth Innocenti Manolescu (2004). Formal Propriety as Rhetorical Norm. Argumentation 18 (1):113-125.
Bart Verheij (2003). Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):167-195.
Katarzyna Budzyńska (2006). Persuasion. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):343-362.
Christof Rapp & Tim Wagner (2013). On Some Aristotelian Sources of Modern Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 27 (1):7-30.
A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (2003). Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion. Argumentation 17 (4):405-419.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-10-04Total downloads13 ( #87,849 of 549,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,007 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
