Navigating the Social Governance Gap

Abstract
When business organisations become involved in contributing to and resolving social issues, they enter areas traditionally seen as the purview of governments. In doing so, they begin to take on the expectations and responsibilities of government; they become politicised. This politicisation is a product of business’s success and power and appears largely unavoidable. Adopting Matten & Crane’s (2005a) extended view of corporate citizenship, business organisations’ responsibilities extend to the administration of citizens’ social, civil and political rights. We term these areas where business organisations take over the administration of citizenship rights as the social governance gap. Drawing upon the agenda of Margolis and Walsh (2003), we seek to enhance the understanding of how business navigates its responsibilities within the social governance gap, including its function as a significant actor influencing societal development and wellbeing. We do this through an exploration of Rio Tinto’s involvement in the WA Future Fund. This paper forms part of an introductory scoping case study of the Rio Tinto WA Future fund and its function as one of Rio Tinto’s diverse responses to community development issues in Western Australia
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,273
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Elsa Dawson (1998). The Relevance of Social Audit for Oxfam GB. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1457-1469.
Debbie M. Thorne & Beverly T. Venable (2008). Governance Theory and Practice for Nonprofit Organisations. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (2):148-168.
Trevor Goddard & David Teller (2006). Evolving Corporate Social Responsibility. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:98-103.
Frank Jan de Graaf (2005). Corporate Social Performance and the Governance Structure. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:225-229.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index

2012-09-18

Total downloads

0

Recent downloads (6 months)

0

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.