Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:228-233 (2007)
|Abstract||When business organisations become involved in contributing to and resolving social issues, they enter areas traditionally seen as the purview of governments. In doing so, they begin to take on the expectations and responsibilities of government; they become politicised. This politicisation is a product of business’s success and power and appears largely unavoidable. Adopting Matten & Crane’s (2005a) extended view of corporate citizenship, business organisations’ responsibilities extend to the administration of citizens’ social, civil and political rights. We term these areas where business organisations take over the administration of citizenship rights as the social governance gap. Drawing upon the agenda of Margolis and Walsh (2003), we seek to enhance the understanding of how business navigates its responsibilities within the social governance gap, including its function as a significant actor influencing societal development and wellbeing. We do this through an exploration of Rio Tinto’s involvement in the WA Future Fund. This paper forms part of an introductory scoping case study of the Rio Tinto WA Future fund and its function as one of Rio Tinto’s diverse responses to community development issues in Western Australia|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Elsa Dawson (1998). The Relevance of Social Audit for Oxfam GB. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1457-1469.
Debbie M. Thorne & Beverly T. Venable (2008). Governance Theory and Practice for Nonprofit Organisations. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (2):148-168.
Paul Kapelus (2002). Mining, Corporate Social Responsibility and the "Community": The Case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi. Journal of Business Ethics 39 (3):275 - 296.
David Hess (2008). The Three Pillars of Corporate Social Reporting as New Governance Regulation. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (4):447-482.
Trevor Goddard & David Teller (2006). Evolving Corporate Social Responsibility. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:98-103.
Silke Machold & Ajit Kumar Vasudevan (2004). Corporate Governance Models in Emerging Markets: The Case of India. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (1):56-77.
Ariane Berthoin Antal, Maria Oppen & André Sobczak (forthcoming). (Re)Discovering the Social Responsibility of Business in Germany. Journal of Business Ethics.
Evonne Miller, Laurie Buys & Jennifer Summerville (2007). Quantifying the Social Dimension of Triple Bottom Line: Development of a Framework and Indicators to Assess the Social Impact of Organisations. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (3):223-237.
A. L. Minkes, M. W. Small & S. R. Chatterjee (1999). Leadership and Business Ethics: Does It Matter? Implications for Management. Journal of Business Ethics 20 (4):327 - 335.
Deon Rossouw & Alejo G. Sison (eds.) (2006). Global Perspectives on the Ethics of Corporate Governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dirk Matten, Andrew Crane & Wendy Chapple (2003). Behind the Mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate Citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics 45 (1-2):109 - 120.
Sepideh Parsa, Reza Kouhy & Christos Tzovas (2007). Governance and Social Information Disclosure Evidence From the UK. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (3):205-222.
Frank Jan de Graaf (2005). Corporate Social Performance and the Governance Structure. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:225-229.
Dimple Grover, Ravi Shankar & Amulya Khurana (2007). An Interpretive Structural Model of Corporate Governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (4):446-460.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-09-18
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?