Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 66 (4):377 - 391 (2006)
|Abstract||While stakeholder theory has traditionally considered organization’s interactions with stakeholders in terms of independent, dyadic relationships, recent scholarship has pointed to the fact that organizations exist within a complex network of intertwining relationships [e.g., Rowley, T. J.: 1997, The Academy of Management Review 22(4), 887–910]. However, further theoretical and empirical development of the interactions between stakeholders has been lacking. In this paper, we develop a framework for understanding and measuring the effects upon the organization of competing, complementary and cooperative stakeholder interactions, which we refer to as stakeholder multiplicity. We draw upon three forms of fit (i.e. fit as matching, fit as moderation, and fit as gestalts; Venkatraman, N.: 1989) to develop a framework for understanding stakeholder multiplicity based upon the direction, strength, and synergies of the interacting claims. Additionally, we draw upon the theory of stakeholder identification and salience of Mitchell et al. (1997), which we argue provides a more relevant and significantly more illustrative explanation of the nature and effects of stakeholder interactions upon the organization than the network approach of Rowley (1997). Furthermore, we ground our framework through reference to three stakeholder groups (i.e. governments, customers, and employees) and the stakeholder issue of concern for the natural environment. We propose a hierarchy of the multiplicity strength of influence of these three stakeholder groups. Potential measurement and implications are discussed.|
|Keywords||corporate social responsibility stakeholder networks stakeholder multiplicity stakeholder salience stakeholder theory strategic fit|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Adele Santana (2012). Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):257-265.
Päivi Myllykangas, Johanna Kujala & Hanna Lehtimäki (2010). Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What Do We Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):65-72.
Marc Lampe (2001). Mediation as an Ethical Adjunct of Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 31 (2):165 - 173.
Wim Vandekerckhove & Nikolay A. Dentchev (2005). A Network Perspective on Stakeholder Management: Facilitating Entrepreneurs in the Discovery of Opportunities. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 60 (3):221 - 232.
Andrew Crane & Trish Ruebottom (2011). Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):77-87.
Brian Harvey & Anja Schaefer (2001). Managing Relationships with Environmental Stakeholders: A Study of U.K. Water and Electricity Utilities. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 30 (3):243 - 260.
José A. Plaza-Úbeda, Jerónimo de Burgos-Jiménez & Eva Carmona-Moreno (2010). Measuring Stakeholder Integration: Knowledge, Interaction and Adaptational Behavior Dimensions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 93 (3):419-442.
Julia Roloff (2008). Learning From Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):233 - 250.
Robert A. Phillips & Joel Reichart (2000). The Environment as a Stakeholder? A Fairness-Based Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 23 (2):185 - 197.
Benjamin A. Neville, Simon J. Bell & Gregory J. Whitwell (2011). Stakeholder Salience Revisited: Refining, Redefining, and Refueling an Underdeveloped Conceptual Tool. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 102 (3):357-378.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #55,876 of 750,430 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #62,995 of 750,430 )
How can I increase my downloads?