Stakeholder Salience Revisited: Refining, Redefining, and Refueling an Underdeveloped Conceptual Tool [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 102 (3):357-378 (2011)
|Abstract||This article revisits and further develops Mitchell et al.’s (Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886, 1997 ) theory of stakeholder identification and salience. Stakeholder salience holds considerable unrealized potential for understanding how organizations may best manage multiple stakeholder relationships. While the salience framework has been cited numerous times, attempts to develop it further have been relatively limited. We begin by reviewing the key contributions of other researchers. We then identify and seek to resolve three residual weaknesses in Mitchell et al.’s ( 1997 ) framework, thereby strengthening its foundations for further development. We argue, first, that urgency is not relevant for identifying stakeholders; second, that it is primarily the moral legitimacy of the stakeholder’s claim that applies to stakeholder salience; and last, that the salience of stakeholders will vary as the degrees of the attributes vary. These insights inform revised definitions of stakeholder salience and legitimacy, and necessitate a new theoretical underpinning for the role of legitimacy. Finally, we present an extensive agenda for future research with the objective of refueling research in stakeholder salience|
|Keywords||legitimacy stakeholder identification stakeholder salience power urgency|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Milena M. Parent & David L. Deephouse (2007). A Case Study of Stakeholder Identification and Prioritization by Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (1):1 - 23.
Cathy Driscoll & Mark Starik (2004). The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing the Conceptual Consideration of Stakeholder Status for the Natural Environment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 49 (1):55-73.
David Saiia & Vananh le (2009). A Map Leading to Less Waste. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:302-313.
Ronald K. Mitchell, Bradley R. Agle, James J. Chrisman & Laura J. Spence (2011). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Salience in Family Firms. Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (2):235-255.
David Saiia (2005). Stakeholder Salience, Shifting Networks and Sustainability. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:342-346.
Vanessa Magness (2008). Who Are the Stakeholders Now? An Empirical Examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood Theory of Stakeholder Salience. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (2):177 - 192.
Päivi Myllykangas, Johanna Kujala & Hanna Lehtimäki (2010). Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What Do We Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):65-72.
Chenting Su, Ronald K. Mitchell & M. Joseph Sirgy (2007). Enabling Guanxi Management in China: A Hierarchical Stakeholder Model of Effective Guanxi. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 71 (3):301 - 319.
Benjamin A. Neville & Bulent Menguc (2006). Stakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions Between Stakeholders. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 66 (4):377 - 391.
Adele Santana (2012). Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):257-265.
Brian K. Burton & Michael Goldsby (2005). Stakeholder Salience and Corporate Performance. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:302-305.
Johanna Kujala, Anna Heikkinen & Hanna Lehtimäki (2012). Understanding the Nature of Stakeholder Relationships: An Empirical Examination of a Conflict Situation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):53-65.
Yves Fassin (2010). A Dynamic Perspective in Freeman's Stakeholder Model. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):39-49.
Brian K. Burton & Michael Goldsby (2005). Stakeholder Salience and Ethical Views of Small Business Managers. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:306-309.
Julia Roloff (2008). Learning From Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):233 - 250.
Added to index2011-08-18
Total downloads5 ( #170,048 of 732,743 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 732,743 )
How can I increase my downloads?