Perspectives on Science 17 (2):pp. 212-231 (2009)
|Abstract||In a recent essay review of William R. Newman, Atoms and Alchemy (2006), Ursula Klein defends her position that philosophically informed corpuscularian theories of matter contributed little to the growing knowledge of "reversible reactions" and robust chemical species in the early modern period. Newman responds here by providing further evidence that an experimental, scholastic tradition of alchemy extending well into the Middle Ages had already argued extensively for the persistence of ingredients during processes of "mixture" (e.g. chemical reactions), and that this corpuscular alchemical tradition bore important fruit in the work of early modern chymists such as Daniel Sennert and Robert Boyle.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Bergmann (2007). Is Klein an Infinitist About Doxastic Justification? Philosophical Studies 134 (1):19 - 24.
Philip Wexler (2008). A Secular Alchemy of Social Science: The Denial of Jewish Messianism in Freud and Durkheim. Theoria 55 (116):1-21.
Keith S. Taber (2003). The Atom in the Chemistry Curriculum: Fundamental Concept, Teaching Model or Epistemological Obstacle? Foundations of Chemistry 5 (1):43-84.
Ursula Klein (2005). Technoscience. Perspectives on Science 13 (2).
Alan Chalmers (2012). Klein on the Origin of the Concept of Chemical Compound. Foundations of Chemistry 14 (1):37-53.
William R. Newman (2001). Corpuscular Alchemy and the Tradition of Aristotle's Meteorology, with Special Reference to Daniel Sennert. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (2):145 – 153.
Robert Ralley (2006). Alchemical Artisans, Artisanal Alchemy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (2):344-352.
Added to index2009-04-25
Total downloads17 ( #71,134 of 549,119 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,119 )
How can I increase my downloads?