Evidence from optic ataxia does not support a distinction between planning and control mechanisms in human motor control
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):45-46 (2004)
Evidence from optic ataxic patients with bilateral lesions to the superior parietal lobes does not support the view that there are separate planning and control mechanisms located in the IPL and SPL respectively. The aberrant reaches of patients with bilateral SPL damage towards extrafoveal targets seem to suggest a deficit in the selection of appropriate motor programmes rather than a deficit restricted to on-line control.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David A. Westwood (2004). Planning, Control, and the Illusion of Explanation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):54-55.
Bruce Bridgeman (2004). Defining Visuomotor Dissociations and an Application to the Oculomotor System. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):27-28.
David A. Rosenbaum (2001). Computational Motor Planning and the Theory of Event Coding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):902-903.
Valérie Gaveau & Michel Desmurget (2004). Do Movement Planning and Control Represent Independent Modules? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):35-36.
James G. Phillips, Thomas J. Triggs & James W. Meehan (2004). Planning and Control of Action as Solutions to an Independence of Visual Mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):46-47.
Scott H. Johnson-Frey (2004). The Organization of Action Representations in Posterior Parietal Cortex. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):40-41.
H. Branch Coslett & Laurel J. Buxbaum (2004). The Planning–Control Model and Spatio-Motor Deficits Following Brain Damage. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):31-32.
Jos J. Adam & Ron F. Keulen (2004). FMRI Evidence for and Behavioral Evidence Against the Planning–Control Model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):24-24.
David E. Vaillancourt, Mary A. Mayka & Daniel M. Corcos (2004). The Control Process is Represented in Both the Inferior and Superior Parietal Lobules. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):51-52.
Scott Glover (2004). Separate Visual Representations in the Planning and Control of Action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):3-24.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #445,068 of 1,934,897 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #196,395 of 1,934,897 )
How can I increase my downloads?