Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Janet Broughton’s Descartes’s Method of Doubt1 is a systematic study of the role of doubt in Descartes’s epistemology. The book has two parts. Part 1 focuses on the development of doubt in the First Meditation, exploring such topics as the motivation behind methodic doubt; the targeted audience; the method’s game-like character (on her view); its relations to ancient skepticism, its reasonableness; the method’s presuppositions relative to commonsense belief; Michael Williams’s recent criticisms of Descartes; and more. Part 2 focuses on how doubt figures in the constructive epistemology of the Meditations—on how Descartes employs doubt as a tool for founding knowledge. I’ll have much more to say about part 2. A careful treatment of the topics of this book has been long overdue. Broughton’s ideas are innovative, engaging, and clearly developed at every stage. The wide-ranging issues addressed remind the reader of why Descartes’s thought is of continuing philosophical interest. Throughout, her interpretation is sensitive to the exegetical concerns of scholars. This rich book deserves the attention of every serious student of Descartes. The present paper is a critical study of part 2—the more ambitious part of this highly ambitious book. I begin with an overview of Broughton’s account. Sections 2–4 contain my analysis.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Lex Newman (2004). Rocking the Foundations of Cartesian Knowledge: Critical Notice of Janet Broughton, "Descartes's Method of Doubt". Philosophical Review 113 (1):101-125.
Marleen Rozemond (2004). Critical Notice of Janet Broughton, Descartes's Method of Doubt. [REVIEW] Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (4):591-613.
Janet Broughton (2002). Descartes' Method of Doubt. Princeton University Press.
Karen Detlefsen (2006). Descartes's Method of Doubt Janet Broughton Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002, Xv + 217 Pp., $16.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Dialogue 45 (02):404-.
Fred Ablondi (2007). Why It Matters That I'm Not Insane: The Role of the Madness Argument in Descartes's First Meditation. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):79-89.
Constance Blackwell (2009). Part Four: Sources of Cartesian Doubt. Aristotle's Perplexity Becomes Descartes's Doubt : Metaphysics 3, 1 and Methodical Doubt in Benito Pereira and René Descartes. [REVIEW] In Maia Neto, José Raimundo, Gianni Paganini & John Christian Laursen (eds.), Skepticism in the Modern Age: Building on the Work of Richard Popkin. Brill.
David Scott (2008). Malebranche and Descartes on Method: Psychologism, Free Will, and Doubt. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):581-604.
Georges Dicker (1993). Descartes: An Analytical and Historical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
A. Raftopoulos (2003). Cartesian Analysis and Synthesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):265-308.
Samuel C. Rickless (2005). The Cartesian Fallacy Fallacy. Noûs 39 (2):309–336.
Karl-Otto Apel (1998). The Cartesian Paradigm of First Philosophy: A Critical Appreciation From the Perspective of Another (the Next?) Paradigm. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (1):1 – 16.
Janet Broughton & Ruth Mattern (1978). Reinterpreting Descartes on the Notion of the Union of Mind and Body. Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (1):23-32.
Michael Della Rocca (2005). Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology Without God. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):1–33.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads4 ( #189,291 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?