The chrysippus intuition and contextual theories of truth

Philosophical Studies 142 (3):345 - 352 (2009)
Abstract
Contextual theories of truth are motivated primarily by the resolution they provide to paradoxical reasoning about truth. The principal argument for contextual theories of truth relies on a key intuition about the truth value of the proposition expressed by a particular utterance made during paradoxical reasoning, which Anil Gupta calls “the Chrysippus intuition.” In this paper, I argue that the principal argument for contextual theories of truth is circular, and that the Chrysippus intuition is false. I conclude that the philosophical motivation for contextual theories of truth fails.
Keywords Truth  Contextual theory of truth  Chrysippus intuition
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    Tyler Burge (1979). Semantical Paradox. Journal of Philosophy 76 (4):169-198.
    Keith S. Donnellan (1957). A Note on the Liar Paradox. Philosophical Review 66 (3):394-397.
    Haim Gaifman (1992). Pointers to Truth. Journal of Philosophy 89 (5):223-261.

    View all 11 references

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2009-01-28

    Total downloads

    35 ( #41,670 of 1,088,833 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,833 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.