David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
ASCS 2009 Proceedings of the 9th Australasian Society for Cognitive Science Conference (2010)
We show how an epistemology informed by cognitive science promises to shed light on an ancient problem in the philosophy of mathematics: the problem of exactness. The problem of exactness arises because geometrical knowledge is thought to concern perfect geometrical forms, whereas the embodiment of such forms in the natural world may be imperfect. There thus arises an apparent mismatch between mathematical concepts and physical reality. We propose that the problem can be solved by emphasizing the ways in which the brain can transform and organize its perceptual intake. It is not necessary for a geometrical form to be perfectly instantiated in order for perception of such a form to be the basis of a geometrical concept.
|Keywords||problem of exactness Aristotle philosophy of mathematics perception cognition|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Anne Newstead & Franklin James, The Epistemology of Geometry I: The Problem of Exactness. Proceedings of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science 2009.
Anne Newstead & Franklin James, The Epistemology of Geometry I: The Problem of Exactness. ASCS09: Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science (pp. 254-260). Sydney: Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science.
Philip Catton (1999). Problems with the Deductivist Image of Scientific Reasoning. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):473.
Vadim Batitsky (1998). From Inexactness to Certainty: The Change in Hume's Conception of Geometry. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (1):1-20.
J. Barkley Rosser Jr (2004). Epistemological Implications of Economic Complexity. Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 13 (1):45-57.
J. Dybikowski (1996). Aristotle on the Goals and Exactness of Ethics. Ancient Philosophy 16 (1):233-238.
Stewart Shapiro (1983). Mathematics and Reality. Philosophy of Science 50 (4):523-548.
C. Evangeliou (1998). Aristotle on the Goals and Exactness of Ethics. International Studies in Philosophy 30 (4):103-105.
St Virvidakis (1995). Aristotle on the Exactness and Goals of Ethics. Philosophical Inquiry 17 (3-4):65-69.
Georges Dicker (1980). Perceptual Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Russell Marcus (2007). Structuralism, Indispensability, and the Access Problem. Facta Philosophica 9 (1):203-211.
Lloyd P. Gerson (1995). Aristotle on the Goals and Exactness of Ethics. Review of Metaphysics 49 (1):118-119.
Sheldon J. Chow (2013). What's the Problem with the Frame Problem? Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (2):309-331.
Added to index2011-03-03
Total downloads31 ( #135,239 of 1,934,518 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #91,699 of 1,934,518 )
How can I increase my downloads?