Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):759-760 (2000)
|Abstract||The notion of ecological rationality, although plausible, does not readily lead to testable predictions. This is illustrated with respect to heuristics in syllogistic reasoning. Several possible heuristics have been proposed but ecological rationality does not appear to offer a sensible rationale for choosing between these.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Malcolm R. Forster (1999). How Do Simple Rules `Fit to Reality' in a Complex World? Minds and Machines 9 (4):543-564.
Gerd Gigerenzer & Thomas Sturm (2012). How (Far) Can Rationality Be Naturalized? Synthese 187 (1):243-268.
Susan Hurley (2005). Social Heuristics That Make Us Smarter. Philosophical Psychology 18 (5):585 – 612.
Annika Wallin & Peter Gärdenfors (2000). Smart People Who Make Simple Heuristics Work. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):765-765.
Leah Savion & Raymundo Morado (2007). The Role of Logical Inference in Heuristic Rationality. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:13-18.
Gerd Gigerenzer (1999). Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford University Press.
William C. Wimsatt (2000). Heuristics Refound. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):766-767.
Stephen J. Wykstra (1982). Curried Lakatos or, How Not to Spice Up the Norm-Ladenness Thesis. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:29 - 39.
Paul C. Kainen (2000). The Role of Mathematics in Heuristic Performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):755-756.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,429 of 739,328 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?