Graduate studies at Western
The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:61-72 (2001)
|Abstract||In this paper, I discuss the problem of how empty persons can make distinctions between right and wrong within the two-truths doctrine of the Buddhist tradition. To do so, I rely on the teachings of the fifteenth- century founder of Tibetan Buddhism, Tsong kha pa Lo sang drak pa. I summarize Tsong kha pa’s exposition of the Buddhist tradition on this question, and then show how he held that profound emptiness, the ultimate truth found under scrupulous analysis of how things exist, must be understood as complementing and fulfilling, rather than canceling, the principles of moral action, based as they are, primarily, on valid conventional distinctions. Along the way, I highlight Tsong kha pa’s major contribution to the history of Tibetan philosophy, namely, that conventional realities are not obviated by their profound emptiness of essence but have their own kind of validity; I then outline his criteria for saying that something exists conventionally|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joe Bransford Wilson (1996). The Monk as Bodhisattva: A Tibetan Integration of Buddhist Moral Points of View. Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (2):377 - 402.
Sonam Thakchoe (2003). 'The Relationship Between the Two Truths': A Comparative Analysis of Two Tibetan Accounts. Contemporary Buddhism 4 (2):111-127.
Chizuko Yoshimizu & 千鶴子 吉水, The Distinction Between Right and Wrong in the Conventional (Kun Rdzob, Samvrti) According to Tsong Kha Pa and mKhas Grub Rje.
Sonam Thakchoe (2007). The Two Truths Debate: Tsongkhapa and Gorampa on the Middle Way. Wisdom Publications.
Tsoṅ-kha-pa Blo-bzaṅ-grags-pa (1991). The Central Philosophy of Tibet: A Study and Translation of Jey Tsong Khapa's Essence of True Eloquence. Princeton Univ Pr.
Jay L. Garfield (2006). The Conventional Status of Reflexive Awareness: What's at Stake in a Tibetan Debate? Philosophy East and West 56 (2):201-228.
Jan Westerhoff, Jay Garfield, Tom Tillemans, Graham Priest, Georges Dreyfus, Sonam Thakchoe, Guy Newland, Mark Siderits, Brownwyn Finnigan & Koji Tanaka (2011). Moonshadows. Conventional Truth in Buddhist Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Michael M. Broido (1988). Veridical and Delusive Cognition: Tsong-Kha-Pa on the Two Satyas. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 16 (1):29-63.
Sonam Thakchoe (2005). 'Transcendental Knowledge'in Tibetan Mādhyamika Epistemology. Contemporary Buddhism 6 (2):131-152.
Elizabeth Napper (1989). Dependent-Arising and Emptiness: A Tibetan Buddhist Interpretation of Mādhyamika Philosophy Emphasizing the Compatibility of Emptiness and Conventional Phenomena. Wisdom Publications.
D. Seyfort Ruegg (2004). The Indian and the Indic in Tibetan Cultural History, and Tson Kha Pa's Achievement as a Scholar and Thinker: An Essay on the Concepts of Buddhism in Tibet and Tibetan Buddhism. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 32 (4):321-343.
Jay Garfield (1995). The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Oxford University Press.
Hisayasu Kobayashi (2011). Prajñākaragupta on the Two Truths and Argumentation. Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):427-439.
Alex Wayman (1994). Response to Mark Tatz' Review of "Ethics of Tibet": Bodhisattva Section of Tsong-Kha-Pa's Lam Rim Chen Mo. Philosophy East and West 44 (1):145-147.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads1 ( #294,406 of 757,546 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,427 of 757,546 )
How can I increase my downloads?