An Argument for Utilitarianism

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):229 - 239 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many utilitarians accept Bentham's view that to argue for the principle of utility is as ‘impossible as it is needless'. They take utilitarianism as a first principle which one either accepts or does not. They do, of course, defend utilitarianism against objections, and make objections to other ethical positions; but the principle of utility itself, they hold, must stand on its own merits. In this article we use a different approach. We introduce a principle, which we call ‘Weak Majority Preference', which we believe likely to be accepted by many who do not consider themselves utilitarians. We then show that from this principle it is possible to derive the general principle of utility.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An argument for utilitarianism: A defence.Yew-Kwang Ng & Peter Singer - 1990 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (4):448 – 454.
Ng and Singer on Utilitarianism: A Reply.Yew-Kwang Ng & Peter Singer - 1983 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):241 - 242.
Peter Singer's Argument for Utilitarianism.Stephen Buckle - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (3):175-194.
Hare's defense of utilitarianism.Thomas L. Carson - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 50 (1):97 - 115.
Hare on utilitarianism and intuitive morality.Tom Carson - 1993 - Erkenntnis 39 (3):305 - 331.
A comment on mill's argument for utilitarianism.Shia Moser - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):308-318.
The Concept of the Irreplaceable.John N. Martin - 1979 - Environmental Ethics 1 (1):31-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
72 (#223,965)

6 months
15 (#157,754)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Ethics and Intuitions: A Reply to Singer.Joakim Sandberg & Niklas Juth - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (3):209-226.
An argument for utilitarianism: A defence.Yew-Kwang Ng & Peter Singer - 1990 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (4):448 – 454.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mathematical Psychics.F. Y. Edgeworth - 1881 - Mind 6 (24):581-583.

Add more references