Design and validation of a novel new instrument for measuring the effect of moral intensity on accountants' propensity to manage earnings
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 84 (3):367 - 387 (2009)
The goal of this study was to construct a valid new instrument to measure the effect of moral intensity on managers' propensity to manage earnings. More specifically, this study is a pilot study of the impact of moral intensity on financial accountants' propensity to manage earnings. The instrument, once validated, will be used in a full-study of managers in the hotel industry. Different ethical scenarios were presented to respondents in the survey; each ethical scenario was designed in both high or low moral intensity form, to reflect the importance of the moral dilemma at hand. The results were analysed by factor analysis. The findings of this study have positively validated the instrument, with three of the five moral intensity components identified as having appropriate eigenvalues. This indicates that they have a significant influence in the study. The first factor captures the social consensus dimension and one scenario of the proximity dimension. The second factor indicates an interaction between the temporal immediacy and the magnitude of consequences dimension. The third dimension is probability of effect and one scenario of the proximity dimension. In addition, t-tests indicated that the manipulation of high and low conditions within each scenario were also successful. One limitation of the study might be the use of undergraduate accounting students as manager proxies, although prior evidence suggests use of accounting students as proxies is a valid approach in this type of study. This is a highly novel project as most prior studies have focussed on moral intensity and the general ethical decision-making process
|Keywords||ethics earnings management moral intensity factor analysis survey instrument hotel industry|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Danielle Beu & M. Ronald Buckley (2001). The Hypothesized Relationship Between Accountability and Ethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 34 (1):57 - 73.
Audrey Chia & Lim Swee Mee (2000). The Effects of Issue Characteristics on the Recognition of Moral Issues. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (3):255 - 269.
Steven Lysonski & William Gaidis (1991). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Ethics of Business Students. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (2):141 - 150.
Bev Marshall & Philip Dewe (1997). An Investigation of the Components of Moral Intensity. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (5):521-529.
M. S. Singer (1996). The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgments of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 15 (4):469 - 474.
Citations of this work BETA
Darlene Bay & Alexey Nikitkov (2011). Subjective Probability Assessments of the Incidence of Unethical Behavior: The Importance of Scenario–Respondent Fit. Business Ethics 20 (1):1-11.
Barbara Arel, Cathy A. Beaudoin & Anna M. Cianci (2012). The Impact of Ethical Leadership, the Internal Audit Function, and Moral Intensity on a Financial Reporting Decision. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (3):351-366.
Lerong He & Rong Yang (forthcoming). Does Industry Regulation Matter? New Evidence on Audit Committees and Earnings Management. Journal of Business Ethics.
Similar books and articles
Kanika T. Bhal & Anubha Dadhich (2011). Impact of Ethical Leadership and Leader–Member Exchange on Whistle Blowing: The Moderating Impact of the Moral Intensity of the Issue. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3):485-496.
Sara A. Morris & Robert A. McDonald (1995). The Role of Moral Intensity in Moral Judgments: An Empirical Investigation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (9):715 - 726.
Ming Singer, Sarah Mitchell & Julie Turner (1998). Consideration of Moral Intensity in Ethicality Judgements: Its Relationship with Whistle-Blowing and Need-for-Cognition. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (5):73-87.
John Tsalikis, Bruce Seaton & Philip Shepherd (2008). Relative Importance Measurement of the Moral Intensity Dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics 80 (3):613 - 626.
Joan M. McMahon & Robert J. Harvey (2006). An Analysis of the Factor Structure of Jones' Moral Intensity Construct. Journal of Business Ethics 64 (4):381 - 404.
Thomas R. Shaw (2003). The Moral Intensity of Privacy: An Empirical Study of Webmasters' Attitudes. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 46 (4):301 - 318.
Andrey Chia & Swee Mee Lim (2000). The Effects of Issue Characteristics on the Recognition of Moral Issues. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (3):255-269.
Deborah L. Leitsch (2004). Differences in the Perceptions of Moral Intensity in the Moral Decision Process: An Empirical Examination of Accounting Students. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 53 (3):313-323.
Joan Marie McMahon & Robert J. Harvey (2007). The Effect of Moral Intensity on Ethical Judgment. Journal of Business Ethics 72 (4):335 - 357.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #187,862 of 1,096,179 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #78,979 of 1,096,179 )
How can I increase my downloads?