Interorganizational Favour Exchange and the Relationship Between Doing Well and Doing Good

Journal of Business Ethics 105 (1):53-68 (2012)
Abstract
This article examines whether ethical business practice enhances financial performance with respect to interorganizational favour exchange. We argue that the link between the ethicality and economic utility of interorganizational favour exchange is governed by: (1) organizational–individual interest alignment/conflict and (2) the fairness or justifiability of favour exchanges from the perspective of third parties. We classify interorganizational (IO) favour exchange into four types (Business–Personal, Personal–Business, Personal–Personal and Business–Business favour exchange). Our analysis shows that the first three types of favour exchange are unethical as they involve conflicts between organizational and individual interests in one or both participating organizations that negatively affect organizational value creation. The last type of favour exchange involves organizational–individual interest alignment in both participating organizations and positively affects the capacity of those involved in the exchange to create value. Favour exchanges of this fourth variety are ethically justifiable unless they unfairly damage the legitimate interests of third parties. In the latter case, these favour exchanges create the risk of negative third party reactions, which in turn affect the sustainability of the benefits of the favour exchanges to the focal group (the dyad). Our research results advance understanding of the ethical and economic implications of IO favour exchange, counter the prejudice against this behaviour in organizations, provide ethical guidance for management and business practice, and have implications for the relationship between doing well and doing good.
Keywords Ethical business  Favour exchange  Conflict of interest  Interorganizational relationship  Codes of ethics  Bribery  Stakeholder analysis  Value creation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,273
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Ronald A. Cordero (1988). Aristotle and Fair Deals. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (9):681 - 690.
Stephen Lovell, Alena V. Ledeneva & A. B. Rogachevskiĭ (eds.) (2000). Bribery and Blat in Russia: Negotiating Reciprocity From the Middle Ages to the 1990s. St. Martin's Press, in Association with School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of London.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-01

Total downloads

6 ( #189,939 of 1,096,337 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #58,557 of 1,096,337 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.