Moral issues and gender differences in ethical judgment using Reidenbach and Robin's (1990) multidimensional ethics scale: Implications in teaching of business ethics
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 77 (4) (2008)
In this study, we examined moral issues and gender differences in ethical judgment using Reidenbach and Robin’s [ Journal of Business Ethics 9 (1990) 639) multidimensional ethics scale (MES). A total of 340 undergraduate students were asked to provide ethical judgment by rating three moral issues in the MES labeled: ‚sales’, ‚auto’, and ‚retail’ using three ethics theories: moral equity, relativism, and contractualism. We found that female students’ ratings of ethical judgment were consistently higher than that of male students across two out of three moral issues examined (i.e., sales and retails) and ethics theories; providing support for Eagly’s [1987, Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-role Interpretation . (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ, England)] social role theory. After controlling for moral issues, women’s higher ratings of ethical judgment over men’s became statistically non-significant. Theoretical and practical implications based on the study’s findings are provided.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Johanna Kujala & Tarja Pietiläinen (2004). Female Managers' Ethical Decision-Making: A Multidimensional Approach. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):153-163.
Randall S. Hansen (1992). A Multidimensional Scale for Measuring Business Ethics: A Purification and Refinement. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (7):523 - 534.
Nhung T. Nguyen & Michael D. Biderman (2008). Studying Ethical Judgments and Behavioral Intentions Using Structural Equations: Evidence From the Multidimensional Ethics Scale. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 83 (4):627 - 640.
Donald H. Schepers (2003). Machiavellianism, Profit, and the Dimensions of Ethical Judgment: A Study of Impact. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 42 (4):339 - 352.
Jeffrey Cohen, Laurie Pant & David Sharp (1993). A Validation and Extension of a Multidimensional Ethics Scale. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (1):13 - 26.
R. E. Reidenbach & D. P. Robin (1990). Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (8):639 - 653.
Patricia L. Smith & Ellwood F. Oakley (1997). Gender-Related Differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Students: Implications for Management. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (1):37-45.
Tim Barnett, Ken Bass & Gene Brown (1994). Ethical Ideology and Ethical Judgment Regarding Ethical Issues in Business. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (6):469 - 480.
Susan M. Bosco, David E. Melchar, Laura L. Beauvais & David E. Desplaces (2010). Teaching Business Ethics: The Effectiveness of Common Pedagogical Practices in Developing Students' Moral Judgment Competence. Ethics and Education 5 (3):263 - 280.
Nhung T. Nguyen, M. Tom Basuray, William P. Smith, Donald Kopka & Donald McCulloh (2008). Moral Issues and Gender Differences in Ethical Judgment Using Reidenbach and Robin's (1990) Multidimensional Ethics Scale: Implications in Teaching of Business Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 77 (4):417 - 430.
Added to index2009-05-04
Total downloads12 ( #287,130 of 1,796,539 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #346,486 of 1,796,539 )
How can I increase my downloads?