David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hypatia 16 (2):86-90 (2001)
: Abstract: This essay is a response to comments made by Shane Phelan, Cheshire Calhoun, and Naomi Scheman on my book The Play of Reason: From the Modern to the Postmodern (1999). I reiterate my belief that we best approach the issue of consensus and dissension in second-order justifications of social and political claims not philosophically but sociologically, politically, historically. I suggest similar approaches for dealing with the question of meaning. This move signals an endorsement not of indifference but rather of commitment and humility
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Shane Phelan (2001). The Lines of Reason. Hypatia 16 (2):75-79.
Richard M. Gale (2003). A Response to My Critics. Philo 6 (1):132-165.
Linda Martin Alcoff (1998). Real Knowing : A Response to My Critics. Social Epistemology 12 (3):289 – 305.
Terrence W. Tilley (1997). IV. A Response to My Critics. Philosophy and Theology 10 (1):93-99.
Daniel A. Dombrowski (2010). Responses to Critics. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 31 (3):225-242.
Naomi Scheman (2001). Linda Nicholson's. Hypatia 16 (2).
Naomi Scheman (2001). Linda Nicholson's the Play of Reason: From the Modern to the Postmodern. Hypatia 16 (2):80 - 85.
T. L. Short (2007). Response. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #190,970 of 1,096,411 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #60,433 of 1,096,411 )
How can I increase my downloads?