Graduate studies at Western
Hypatia 16 (2):86-90 (2001)
|Abstract||: Abstract: This essay is a response to comments made by Shane Phelan, Cheshire Calhoun, and Naomi Scheman on my book The Play of Reason: From the Modern to the Postmodern (1999). I reiterate my belief that we best approach the issue of consensus and dissension in second-order justifications of social and political claims not philosophically but sociologically, politically, historically. I suggest similar approaches for dealing with the question of meaning. This move signals an endorsement not of indifference but rather of commitment and humility|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Shane Phelan (2001). The Lines of Reason. Hypatia 16 (2):75-79.
Naomi Scheman (2001). Linda Nicholson's the Play of Reason: From the Modern to the Postmodern. Hypatia 16 (2):80 - 85.
Naomi Scheman (2001). Linda Nicholson's. Hypatia 16 (2).
Daniel A. Dombrowski (2010). Responses to Critics. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 31 (3):225-242.
Terrence W. Tilley (1997). IV. A Response to My Critics. Philosophy and Theology 10 (1):93-99.
Linda Martin Alcoff (1998). Real Knowing : A Response to My Critics. Social Epistemology 12 (3):289 – 305.
Richard M. Gale (2003). A Response to My Critics. Philo 6 (1):132-165.
T. L. Short (2007). Response. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #246,970 of 740,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?