Biological Atomism and Cell Theory
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 41 (3):202-211 (2010)
| Abstract | Biological atomism postulates that all life is composed of elementary and indivisible vital units. The activity of a living organism is thus conceived as the result of the activities and interactions of its elementary constituents, each of which individually already exhibits all the attributes proper to life. This paper surveys some of the key episodes in the history of biological atomism, and situates cell theory within this tradition. The atomistic foundations of cell theory are subsequently dissected and discussed, together with the theory’s conceptual development and eventual consolidation. This paper then examines the major criticisms that have been waged against cell theory, and argues that these too can be interpreted through the prism of biological atomism as attempts to relocate the true biological atom away from the cell to a level of organization above or below it. Overall, biological atomism provides a useful perspective through which to examine the history and philosophy of cell theory, and it also opens up a new way of thinking about the epistemic decomposition of living organisms that significantly departs from the physicochemical reductionism of mechanistic biology. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Biological Atomism Cell Theory Organismal Theory Reductionism Cell | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
William Bechtel (1993). Integrating Sciences by Creating New Disciplines: The Case of Cell Biology. Biology and Philosophy 8 (3):277-299.
William Bechtel (2010). The Cell: Locus or Object of Inquiry? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 41 (3):172-182.
Miguel de Asúa & Gregorio Klimovsky (1990). Ensayo de Axiomatización de la Teoría Tisular Y Su Reducción a la Teoría Celular. Theoria 5 (1):129-140.
Marsha L. Richmond (2000). T. H. Huxley's Criticism of German Cell Theory: An Epigenetic and Physiological Interpretation of Cell Structure. Journal of the History of Biology 33 (2):247 - 289.
W. Schwemmler (1982). The Endoeytobiotic Cell Theory and the Periodic System of Cells. Acta Biotheoretica 31 (1).
Drö & Ariane Scher (2002). Edmund B. Wilson's the Cell and Cell Theory Between 1896 and 1925. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24 (3-4):357-389.
Drö & Ariane Scher (2002). Edmund B. Wilson's the Cell and Cell Theory Between 1896 and 1925. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24 (3-4):357-389.
Drö & Ariane Scher (2002). Edmund B. Wilson's the Cell and Cell Theory Between 1896 and 1925. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24 (3-4):357-389.
H. Frederik Nijhout, Michael C. Reed & Cornelia M. Ulrich (2007). A Day in the Life of Cell Metabolism. Biological Theory 2 (2):124-127.
Attila Grandpierre (2013). The Origin of Cellular Life and Biosemiotics. Biosemiotics:1-15.
MiloŠ Jílek (1975). Stochastic Development of Cell Populations Under Non-Homogeneous Conditions. Acta Biotheoretica 24 (3-4).
L. Margulis (2001). The Conscious Cell. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 929:55-70.
Paul S. Agutter, P. Colm Malone & Denys N. Wheatley (2000). Diffusion Theory in Biology: A Relic of Mechanistic Materialism. Journal of the History of Biology 33 (1):71 - 111.
Gillian Gass & Brian K. Hall (2007). Collectivity in Context: Modularity, Cell Sociology, and the Neural Crest. Biological Theory 2 (4):349-359.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-12Total downloads16 ( #74,590 of 548,985 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,181 of 548,985 )How can I increase my downloads? |

