Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (1):16-42 (2002)
|Abstract||Philip Pettit's neo-Roman republicanism comprises a conceptual account of ?republican freedom? and an institutional account that shows how republican freedom can best be promoted institutionally. If we accept a very slightly amended version of Petit's conceptual account, then his institutional account fares inadequately in terms of four ?problems? to which the conceptual account commits him. An institutional amalgam of Pettit's institutional account and a deliberative democratic public sphere of the sort advanced by john Dryzek ? what I call the deliberative republic ? looks to fare considerably better|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Henry S. Richardson (2006). Republicanism and Democratic Injustice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):175-200.
Christian List (2006). Republican Freedom and the Rule of Law. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):201-220.
Philip Pettit (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press.
Christian List (2004). The Impossibility of a Paretian Republican? Some Comments on Pettit and Sen. Economics and Philosophy 20 (1):65-87.
Lars Vinx (2010). Constitutional Indifferentism and Republican Freedom. Political Theory 38 (6):809-837.
Mark Rigstad (2011). Republicanism and Geopolitical Domination. Journal of Political Power 4 (2):279-300.
Philip Pettit (2006). Freedom in the Market. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):131--149.
M. Victoria Costa (2009). Neo-Republicanism, Freedom as Non-Domination, and Citizen Virtue. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (4):401-419.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads15 ( #78,614 of 549,069 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,703 of 549,069 )
How can I increase my downloads?