Community and justice: The challenges of bicultural partnership to policy on assisted reproductive technology
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bioethics 10 (3):212–221 (1996)
Listening to other cultures offers challenges to our fundamental assumptions and world views. In New Zealand public policy on Assisted Reproductive Technology is being worked out in a society committed to the development of bicultural partnership honouring the Treaty of Waitangi, a treaty with the indigenous people.Strong claims to the cultural significance of genetic heritage by Maori have made apparent to non-Maori their own assumptions. These claims also resist reductive understandings of genetics.In this paper I review, as a Pakeha ethicist, initiatives taken in New Zealand, and the impact of bicultural development on public policy on ART. I also discuss some of the issues this raises for western bioethics as it relates to non-western approaches and include reference to the significance of genetic heritage as it is affecting guidelines for donor insemination and surrogacy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
L. Skene (1999). Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Analysis and Recommendations for Public Policy. Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (3):281-282.
Anne Drapkin Lyerly & Ruth R. Faden (2003). HIV and Assisted Reproductive Technology: Women and Healthcare Policy. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):41-43.
Michele Goodwin, Assisted Reproductive Technology & the Double-Bind: The Illusory Choice of Motherhood.
Jennifer Parks (2009). Rethinking Radical Politics in the Context of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Bioethics 23 (1):20-27.
Mairi Levitt (2004). Assisted Reproduction: Managing an Unruly Technology. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 12 (1):41-49.
Sonia Bychkov Green, Interstate Intercourse: How Modern Assisted Reproductive Technologies Challenge the Traditional Realm of Conflicts of Law.
Karen F. Balkin & Robert D. Lane (2005). Assisted Suicide. Greenhaven Press.
E. Jackson (2005). The Regulation of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (1):e5-e5.
Kristine S. Knaplund, Legal Issues of Maternity and Inheritance for the Biotech Child of the 21st Century.
Susan L. Crockin (2010). Legal Conceptions: The Evolving Law and Policy of Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #553,718 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?