Molecular geneticists and moral responsibility: “Maybe if we were working on the atom bomb I would have a different argument”

Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):515-530 (1999)
Senior molecular geneticists were interviewed about their perceptions of the ethical and social implications of genetic knowledge. Inductive analysis of these interviews identified a number of strategies through which the scientists negotiated their moral responsibilities as they participated in generating knowledge that presents difficult ethical questions. These strategies included: further analysis and application of scientific method; clarification of multiple roles; negotiation with the public through public debate, institutional processes of funding, ethics committees and legislation; and personal responsibility.
Keywords genetics  ethics  moral responsibility  molecular science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-999-0052-3
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,660
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. British Journal of Educational Studies 42 (4):409-410.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

12 ( #318,068 of 1,938,821 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #458,338 of 1,938,821 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.