Do internal due process system permit adequate political and moral space for ethics voice, praxis, and community?
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 24 (1):1 - 27 (2000)
Internal due process systems are the formal mechanisms thatmany organizations use to address and resolve ethics conflicts.Problematical due process systems such asinvestigation-punishment and grievance-arbitration systemsnarrowly constrain the political and moral space needed formeaningful ethics voice, praxis, and community. The relativelyuncommon employee board and mediator-counselor types of systemscan help solve such problems. The employee board andmediator-counselor systems permit questioning not only of guiltwith respect to policy violations but also the appropriateness ofthe policies as well as potential biases in an organization'sembedded tradition-system that may be contributing to unethicalbehavior. Theoretical implications for organization ethics,praxis, community, and integrative social contracts theories areexplored. Several case examples are discussed.
|Keywords||Philosophy Ethics Business Education Economic Growth Management|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Katherina Glac & Tae Wan Kim (2009). The "I" in ISCT: Normative and Empirical Facets of Integration. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):693 - 705.
Maria Lai-Ling Lam (2009). Beyond Credibility of Doing Business in China: Strategies for Improving Corporate Citizenship of Foreign Multinational Enterprises in China. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):137 - 146.
Dirk Ulrich Gilbert & Michael Behnam (2009). Advancing Integrative Social Contracts Theory: A Habermasian Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (2):215 - 234.
Similar books and articles
Marjorie Hall Davis (2008). Structures of Evil Encountered in Pastoral Counseling. Zygon 43 (3):665-680.
Joel Norman (2001). Two Visual Systems and Two Theories of Perception: An Attempt to Reconcile the Constructivist and Ecological Approaches. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):73-96.
Judith Bach (2002). Evolutionary Guidance System: A Community Design Project. World Futures 58 (5 & 6):417 – 423.
Charles Cambridge (2001). Compassion Versus Competitiveness: An Industrial Relations Perspective on the Impact of Globalization on the Standards of Employee Relations Ethics in the United States. Ethics and Behavior 11 (1):87 – 103.
Douglas M. McCabe & Jennifer M. Rabil (2002). Ethics and Values in Nonunion Employment Arbitration:A Historical Study of Organizational Due Processin the Private Sector. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 41 (1-2):13 - 25.
Scott Sonenshein (2005). Business Ethics and Internal Social Criticism. Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (3):475-498.
Cletus T. Andoh (2008). Critical Issues on Informed Consent in Africa. Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):109-123.
Dennis J. Moberg (2003). Managers as Judges in Employee Disputes. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4):453-477.
Richard P. Nielsen (1993). Organization Ethics From a Perspective of Praxis. Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (2):131-151.
Alan J. Richardson (2008). Due Process and Standard-Setting: An Analysis of Due Process in Three Canadian Accounting and Auditing Standard-Setting Bodies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3):679 - 696.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #255,934 of 1,410,123 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,589 of 1,410,123 )
How can I increase my downloads?