License to Harass: Law, Hierarchy, and Offensive Public Speech: Law, Hierarchy, and Offensive Public Speech

Princeton University Press (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Offensive street speech--racist and sexist remarks that can make its targets feel both psychologically and physically threatened--is surprisingly common in our society. Many argue that this speech is so detestable that it should be banned under law. But is this an area covered by the First Amendment right to free speech? Or should it be banned? In this elegantly written book, Laura Beth Nielsen pursues the answers by probing the legal consciousness of ordinary citizens. Using a combination of field observations and in-depth, semistructured interviews, she surveys one hundred men and women, some of whom are routine targets of offensive speech, about how such speech affects their lives. Drawing on these interviews as well as an interdisciplinary body of scholarship, Nielsen argues that racist and sexist speech creates, reproduces, and reinforces existing systems of hierarchy in public places. The law works to normalize and justify offensive public interactions, she concludes, offering, in essence, a "license to harass." Nielsen relates the results of her interviews to statistical surveys that measure the impact of offensive speech on the public. Rather than arguing whether law is the appropriate remedy for offensive speech, she allows that the benefits to democracy, to community, and to society of allowing such speech may very well outweigh the burdens imposed. Nonetheless, these burdens, and the stories of the people who bear them, should not remain invisible and outside the debate.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the meaning of free software.M. J. Wolf, K. W. Miller & F. S. Grodzinsky - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):279-286.
On public speech in a democratic republic at war.Barry Strauss - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):22-37.
Obscene words and the law.Joel Feinberg - 1983 - Law and Philosophy 2 (2):139 - 161.
Free speech and offensive expression.Judith Wagner DeCew - 2004 - Social Philosophy and Policy 21 (2):81-103.
What Is Offensive about Offensive Jokes?Jeanette Bicknell - 2007 - Philosophy Today 51 (4):458-465.
Coercive restraint of offensive actions.Donald Vandeveer - 1979 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 8 (2):175-193.
An Analysis of the W -Hierarchy.Yijia Chen, Jörg Flum & Martin Grohe - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (2):513 - 534.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-09

Downloads
3 (#1,513,612)

6 months
3 (#439,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Illocutionary Frustration.Samia Hesni - 2018 - Mind 127 (508):947-976.
Cat‐Calls, Compliments and Coercion.Lucy McDonald - 2021 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103 (1):208-230.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references