Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Psychology 23 (6):759-773 (2010)
|Abstract||In the last decade several prominent critics have charged that invocation of representations is not only not essential for cognitive science, but should be avoided. These claims have been followed by counterarguments demonstrating that the notion certainly is important in explanations of cognitive phenomena. Analyzing some important contributions to the debate, Anthony Chemero has argued that representationalists still need to explain the significance of the notion once there is an available formal account of a system and has, accordingly, challenged representationalists to provide such an explanation. This paper's first part explains why the representationalist should take an interest in Chemero's challenge. It discusses William Bechtel's account of the representational structure of the Watt Governor, which, among other things, was motivating Chemero to question the relevance of a representational account once a dynamical one is available. The second part contains the answer to Chemero's challenge. It is motivated by the thought that only a representational account of the Watt Governor with a comparable level of detail could possibly add explanatory value to a dynamical account. However, accepting the account also means that it becomes difficult to understand dynamical and representational accounts as rivals. Instead, it would be more adequate to speak of a dynamical account of the representational structure.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Antonio Chella (2005). An Intermediate Level Between the Psychological and the Neurobiological Levels of Descriptions of Appraisal-Emotion Dynamics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):199-200.
Jeffrey Bub (1994). How to Interpret Quantum Mechanics. Erkenntnis 41 (2):253 - 273.
Takashi Ikegami & Jun Tani (2001). Chaotic Itinerancy Needs Embodied Cognition to Explain Memory Dynamics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):818-819.
Timothy L. Hubbard (2007). What is Mental Representation? And How Does It Relate to Consciousness? Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (1):37-61.
Robert van Gulick (1982). Mental Representation: A Functionalist View. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63 (January):3-20.
Angela Mendelovici (2010). Mental Representation and Closely Conflated Topics. Dissertation, Princeton University
Christopher W. Pawlowski (2006). Dynamic Landscapes, Stability and Ecological Modeling. Acta Biotheoretica 54 (1).
Laura Ruetsche (2003). Modal Semantics, Modal Dynamics and the Problem of State Preparation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):25 – 41.
Lawrence Sklar (2012). Philosophy and the Foundations of Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Rocco Gennaro (2008). Representation of a Representation: Reflections on Las Meninas. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (9):47-50.
Hengwei Li & Huaxin Huang (2007). Representation and Development of Cognition. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):583-600.
Gerhard Heyer (1988). Generic Generalisations, Discourse Representation Structures, and Knowledge Representation. In Jakob Hoepelman (ed.), Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Stuttgart Conference Workshop on Discourse Representation, Dialogue Tableaux, and Logic Programming. M. Niemeyer Verlag.
Wayne D. Christensen (2004). Representation and the Meaning of Life. In Hugh Clapin (ed.), Representation in Mind. Elsevier.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads14 ( #90,570 of 739,345 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,345 )
How can I increase my downloads?