The plurality of chinese and american medical moralities: Toward an interpretive cross-cultural bioethics
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (3):239-260 (2000)
: Since the late 1970s, American appraisals of Chinese medical ethics and Chinese responses to American bioethics range from frank criticism to warm appreciation, from refutation to acceptance. Yet in the United States as well as in China, American bioethics and Chinese medical ethics have been seen, respectively, as individualistic and communitarian. In this widely-accepted general comparison, the great variation in the two medical moralities, especially the diversity of Chinese experiences, has been unfortunately minimized, if not totally ignored. Neither American bioethics nor Chinese medical ethics is a field with only one dominant way of thinking. Medical moralities in America and China--traditional and modern--have always been plural and diverse. For example, American and Chinese cultures and medical moralities both exhibit individualistic and communitarian traditions. For this reason, bioethics in general and cross-cultural bioethics in particular must be fundamentally interpretive. Interpretive cross-cultural bioethics appreciates the plurality of medical morality within any culture. It can serve as a vital means of social and cultural criticism through engaged interpretations.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Nie Jing-bao (2005). Cultural Values Embodying Universal Norms: A Critique of a Popular Assumption About Cultures and Human Rights. Developing World Bioethics 5 (3):251–257.
Pingyue Jin, Nikola Biller‐Andorno & Verina Wild (2015). Ethical Implications of Case‐Based Payment in China: A Systematic Analysis. Developing World Bioethics 15 (3):134-142.
Similar books and articles
Laurence B. McCullough (2002). Philosophical Challenges in Teaching Bioethics: The Importance of Professional Medical Ethics and its History for Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (4):395 – 402.
Howard Brody (2009). The Future of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Ren-Zong Qiu (1988). Medicine – the Art of Humaneness: On Ethics of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (3):277-299.
Mark P. Aulisio & L. S. Rothenberg (2002). Bioethics, Medical Humanities, and the Future of the "Field": Reflections on the Results of the ASBH Survey of North American Graduate Bioethics/Medical Humanities Training Programs. American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):3 – 9.
Deborah Woo (1991). China's Importation of Western Psychiatry: Cultural Relativity and Mental Disorders. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (1).
Kazumasa Hoshino, H. Tristram Engelhardt & Lisa M. Rasmussen (eds.) (2002). Bioethics and Moral Content: National Traditions of Health Care Morality: Papers Dedicated in Tribute to Kazumasa Hoshino. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Yali Cong (2004). Doctor-Family-Patient Relationship: The Chinese Paradigm of Informed Consent. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):149 – 178.
Li En-Chang (2008). Bioethics in China. Bioethics 22 (8):448-454.
Renée C. Fox (2008). Observing Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #135,211 of 1,934,424 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,207 of 1,934,424 )
How can I increase my downloads?