“What Has Coltrane to Do With Mozart: The Dynamism and Built-in Flexibility of Music”

Expositions 3:57-71 (2009)
Although contemporary Western culture and criticism has usually valued composition over improvisation and placed the authority of a musical work with the written text rather than the performer, this essay posits these divisions as too facile to articulate the complex dynamics of making music in any genre or form. Rather it insists that music should be understood as pieces that are created with specific intentions by composers but which possess possibilities of interpretation that can only be brought out through performance.
Keywords phenomenology of music  philosophy of music  jazz improvisation
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Cynthia R. Nielsen, “What Has Coltrane to Do With Mozart:  The Dynamism and Built-in Flexibility of Music”
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Clifton Sanders (2009). Democracy as Music, Music as Democracy. Radical Philosophy Review 12 (1/2):219-239.
Andrew Kania, The Philosophy of Music. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Iannis Xenakis (1971). Formalized Music. Bloomington,Indiana University Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

75 ( #40,628 of 1,724,746 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

18 ( #44,229 of 1,724,746 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.