Coercion, guidance and mercifulness: The different influences of ethics programs on decision-making
Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):33 - 42 (2000)
| Abstract | The development of an ethics program is a method frequently used for organising responsible behaviour within organisations. For such a program, certain preconditions have to be created in the structure, culture and strategy. In this organisational context, managers have to take their decisions in a responsible way. This process of decision-making, embedded in an ethics program, is the main focus of this article. Ethics programs often influence decision-making in a formal way; certain norms and types of behaviour are formalised and controlled within the organisation. Subsequently, individual managers have to infer the meaning of responsible behaviour from the demands laid down in the ethics program. Such a formal ethics program has some important advantages but the dangers of such an approach are often ignored. This article discusses both the advantages and disadvantages of a formal ethics program and adds two alternative ways of stimulating responsible behaviour in the organisation. In a monological approach the reflections of the decision makers on their own values are central in differentiating between right and wrong. In a dialogical approach, the communications between decision makers and other stakeholders involved are the foundations for determining a responsible solution. Because each approach is appropriate for certain issues, a well-chosen combination is justified. Such an ethics program should be strict on certain issues but leave room for reflection and interaction on other issues. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLaura P. Hartman & Patricia H. Werhane (forthcoming). A Modular Approach to Business Ethics Integration: At the Intersection of the Stand-Alone and the Integrated Approaches. Journal of Business Ethics.
Chris Robertson & Paul A. Fadil (1999). Ethical Decision Making in Multinational Organizations: A Culture-Based Model. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (4):385 - 392.
Scott J. Vitell, Saviour L. Nwachukwu & James H. Barnes (1993). The Effects of Culture on Ethical Decision-Making: An Application of Hofstede's Typology. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (10):753 - 760.
David J. Fritzsche (1991). A Model of Decision-Making Incorporating Ethical Values. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (11):841 - 852.
S. Andrew Ostapski, John Oliver & Gaston T. Gonzalez (1996). The Legal and Ethical Components of Executive Decision-Making: A Course for Business Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (5):571 - 579.
Clare M. Pennino (2002). Is Decision Style Related to Moral Development Among Managers in the U.S.? Journal of Business Ethics 41 (4):337 - 347.
Kathie L. Pelletier & Michelle C. Bligh (2006). Rebounding From Corruption: Perceptions of Ethics Program Effectiveness in a Public Sector Organization. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (4):359 - 374.
Johanna Kujala & Tarja Pietiläinen (2004). Female Managers' Ethical Decision-Making: A Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):153-163.
Stefan Seiler, Andreas Fischer & Sibylle A. Voegtli (2011). Developing Moral Decision-Making Competence: A Quasi-Experimental Intervention Study in the Swiss Armed Forces. Ethics and Behavior 21 (6):452 - 470.
Darrell Reeck & Jill A. Sharrard (1980). The Professional Ethics Course. Bioethics Quarterly 2 (2):112-117.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,575 of 549,119 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
