David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Human Studies 18 (2-3):301 - 326 (1995)
This paper starts with questioning the traditional approach to the so-called intercultural communication. Most students of intercultural communication, it seems, use the categories characterising a cultural or ethnic identity, such as Western, Indian, European, Aboriginal and the like, as parameters by reference to which some distinctive phenomena observed in conversational materials should be explained. Even though they may apply these categories correctly, they do not take into account the relevancy of these categories in each interaction.The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that being a Japanese is achieved interactively and that interculturality of intercultural communication is constituted in and through the actual course of the interaction. In the analysis of interviews conducted with foreign students in Japan, it can be seen that the interviewer and the interviewee had to keep on coordinating their conduct throughout the development of their interaction in order that they could be a Japanese and a foreigner relevantly. In this way, what, in the studies of intercultural communication, is presupposed to be simply given, that is, the fact of a person being a Japanese or the like, is shown to be analysable and investigable as an interactive phenomenon in its own right.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas, Ziad Swaidan & Jamal Al-Khatib (2006). Does Religion Matter? A Comparison Study of the Ethical Beliefs of Marketing Students of Religious and Secular Universities in Japan. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (1):69 - 86.
M. Elhajji (2008). Intercultural Communication and New Forms of Citizenship. Diogenes 55 (4):99-104.
Germán Fernández (2010). To Understand Understanding: How Intercultural Communication is Possible in Daily Life. [REVIEW] Human Studies 33 (4):371-393.
Donald Holzman (1975). Japanese Religion and Philosophy: A Guide to Japanese Reference and Research Materials. Greenwood Press.
Midori Kagawa-Fox (2010). Environmental Ethics From the Japanese Perspective. Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (1):57 – 73.
Hajime Nakamura (1967/2002). History of Japanese Thought: 592-1868: Japanese Philosophy Before Western Culture Entered Japan. Distributed by Columbia University Press.
Edward Demenchonok (2007). Intercultural Philosophy. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:27-31.
Makoto Nakada & Takanori Tamura (2005). Japanese Conceptions of Privacy: An Intercultural Perspective. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 7 (1):27-36.
Rafael Capurro (2005). Privacy. An Intercultural Perspective. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (1):37-47.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #112,737 of 1,098,956 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #33,712 of 1,098,956 )
How can I increase my downloads?