David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Consciousness Exploration and Research 1 (5):625-639 (2010)
Time’s arrow is necessary for progress from a past that has already happened to a future that is only potential until creatively determined in the present. But time’s arrow is unnecessary in Einstein’s so-called block universe, so there is no creative unfolding in an actual present. How can there be an actual present when there is no universal moment of simultaneity? Events in various places will have different presents according to the position, velocity, and nature of the perceiver. Standing against this view is traditional common sense since we normally experience time’s arrow as reality and the present as our place in the stream of consciousness, but we err to imagine we are living in the actual present. The present of our daily experience is actually a specious present, according to E. Robert Kelly (later popularized by William James), or duration, according to Henri Bergson, an habitus, as elucidated by Kerby (1991), or, simply, the psychological present (Adams, 2010) – all terms indicating that our experienced present so consists of the past overlapping into the future that any potential for acting from the creative moment is crowded out. Yet, for philosophers of process from Herakleitos onward, it is the philosophies of change or process that treat time’s arrow and the creative fire of the actual present as realities. In this essay, I examine the most well known but possibly least understood process cosmology of Alfred North Whitehead to seek out this elusive but actual present. In doing so, I will also ask if process philosophy is itself an example of the creative imagination and if this relates to doing science. I conclude Whitehead's process philosophy falls short of allowing for the actual creative spontaneity of a dynamic (eternal) present.
|Keywords||philosophy of time process philosophy Alfred North Whitehead Bergson eternal now occasions of experience concrescence creativity process theology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gregory M. Nixon (2010). Editorial: Time & Experience: Twins of the Eternal Now? Journal of Consciousness Exploration and Research 1 (5):482-489.
Gregory Nixon (ed.) (2010). Time & Consciousness: Two Faces of One Mystery. QuantumDream, Inc..
Alfred North Whitehead (1966). A Key to Whitehead's Process and Reality. University of Chicago Press.
Christoph Hoerl (2009). Time and Tense in Perceptual Experience. Philosophers' Imprint 9 (12):1-18.
Elizabeth M. Kraus (1998). The Metaphysics of Experience: A Companion to Whitehead's Process and Reality. Fordham University Press.
Wahida Khandker (2007). Two Natures. Process Studies 36 (2):245-271.
Lewis S. Ford & George Louis Kline (eds.) (1983). Explorations in Whitehead's Philosophy. Fordham University Press.
Lewis S. Ford (2009). Temporal and Nontemporal Becoming. Process Studies 38 (1):5-42.
Roland Faber (2012). Three Hundred Years of Whitehead. Process Studies 41 (1):5-20.
Edgar A. Towne (2011). Empirical Naturalism: Bernard M. Loomer's Interpretation of Whitehead's Philosophy. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (3):255 - 266.
F. Ronald Blasius (1997). Alfred North Whitehead's Informal Philosophy of Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (3):303-315.
Anderson Weekes (2004). Process Philosophy: Via Idearum or Via Negativa? In Michel Weber (ed.), Whitehead: Rescher on Process Metaphysics. Ontos 1--223.
Added to index2010-09-16
Total downloads224 ( #12,697 of 1,911,814 )
Recent downloads (6 months)30 ( #24,337 of 1,911,814 )
How can I increase my downloads?