Constructivism in the Human Sciences 11 (1/2):20-31 (2006)
|Abstract||This essay concerns a philosophical examination of the nature of mind and the relevant implications for mental health. Traditionally, realism and constructivism are regarded as two contrastive positions in explaining the nature of mind. While realists take discovery of reality as the main function of mind, constructivists regard it as creation of reality. Hence, epistemologically, realists emphasize on correspondence to reality as the criterion of validity or truth of the mind's contents, whereas constructivists regard the inner coherence of constructs as the main criterion. inner coherence of constructs or resolving inner conflicts; capability of constructs for adaption to problematic situations; and correspondence to reality as an ideal in the long run are the discussions and aims of this paper.|
|Keywords||realistic constructivism philosophy of therapy personal construct theory personal construct psychology George Kelly mind coherence correspondence criteria|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Khosrow Bagheri Noaparast (2000). CONSTRUCTS AND WORDS. Constructivism in the Human Sciences; 5 (1):65-70.
Michael Bergin, John S. G. Wells & Sara Owen (2008). Critical Realism: A Philosophical Framework for the Study of Gender and Mental Health. Nursing Philosophy 9 (3):169-179.
A. Scholl (2012). Between Realism and Constructivism? Luhmann's Ambivalent Epistemological Standpoint. Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):5-12.
Derek Louis Meyer (2009). The Poverty of Constructivism. Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (3):332-341.
Ray S. Jackendoff (1991). The Problem of Reality. Noûs 25 (September):411-33.
Mark LeBar (2008). Aristotelian Constructivism. Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):182-213.
Manuel Arias-Maldonado (2011). Let's Make It Real. Environmental Ethics 33 (4):377-393.
M. A. Boden (2010). Against Constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):84-89.
A. Donk (2011). All Quiet on the Constructivism Front – Or is There a Substantial Contribution of Non-Dualistic Approaches for Communication Science? Constructivist Foundations 7 (1):27-29.
D. I. Dykstra (2010). Radical Constructivism Has an Answer – But This Answer Is Not an Easy One. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):22-30.
Alexander Riegler (2001). Towards a Radical Constructivist Understanding of Science. Foundations of Science 6 (1-3):1-30.
A. Scholl (2010). Radical Constructivism in Communication Science. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):51-57.
Maja Zehfuss (2002). Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2012-01-14
Total downloads31 ( #44,838 of 722,919 )
Recent downloads (6 months)20 ( #6,471 of 722,919 )
How can I increase my downloads?