Carl Cohen's 'kind' arguments for animal rights and against human rights

Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (1):43–59 (2004)
Carl Cohen's arguments against animal rights are shown to be unsound. His strategy entails that animals have rights, that humans do not, the negations of those conclusions, and other false and inconsistent implications. His main premise seems to imply that one can fail all tests and assignments in a class and yet easily pass if one's peers are passing and that one can become a convicted criminal merely by setting foot in a prison. However, since his moral principles imply that nearly all exploitive uses of animals are wrong anyway, foes of animal rights are advised to seek philosophical consolations elsewhere. I note that some other philosopher's arguments are subject to similar objections.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00262.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,585
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Carl Cohen (1997). Do Animals Have Rights? Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):91 – 102.
Scott Wilson (2001). Carruthers and the Argument From Marginal Cases. Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):135–147.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Alasdair Cochrane (2012). From Human Rights to Sentient Rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (5):655-675.
Neil Levy (2004). Cohen and Kinds: A Response to Nathan Nobis. Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):213–217.
Nathan Nobis (2009). Interests and Harms in Primate Research. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (5):27-29.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

92 ( #48,549 of 1,938,649 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #290,621 of 1,938,649 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.