Defending embryo experimentation

Abstract

In Embryo: A Defense of Human Life (Doubleday, 2008), Robert P. George and Christopher Tollefsen argue that human embryo-destructive experimentation is morally wrong and should not be supported with state funds. I argue that their arguments fail.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

The personhood of the human embryo.John F. Crosby - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (4):399-417.
Human dignity in international policy documents: A useful criterion for public policy?Inmaculada de Melo-martín - 2010 - Bioethics 25 (1):37-45.
The potential of the human embryo.Mark T. Brown - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (6):585 – 618.
Stem Cells, Nuclear Transfer and Respect for Embryos.Jens Clausen - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (1):48-59.
Embryo politics: ethics and policy in Atlantic democracies.Thomas F. Banchoff - 2011 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
The metaphysical status of the embryo: Blackwell publishing ltd oxford, uk.David S. Oderberg - unknown
The morality of embryo use.Louis M. Guenin - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
International bio law: an international overview of developments in human embryo research and experimentation.García San José & I. Daniel - 2010 - [Murcia, Spain]: Ediciones Laborum.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-05

Downloads
38 (#398,871)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Nobis
Morehouse College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references