The relationship between visual illusion and aesthetic preference – an attempt to unify experimental phenomenology and empirical aesthetics
Graduate studies at Western
Axiomathes 13 (3-4):261-281 (2003)
|Abstract||Experimental phenomenology has demonstrated that perception is much richer than stimulus. As is seen in color perception, one and the same stimulus provides more than several modes of appearance or perceptual dimensions. Similarly, there are various perceptual dimensions in form perception. Even a simple geometrical figure inducing visual illusion gives not only perceptual impressions of size, shape, slant, depth, and orientation, but also affective or aesthetic impressions. The present study reviews our experimental phenomenological work on visual illusion and experimental aesthetics, and examines how aesthetic preference is influenced by stimulus factors determining visual illusions including anomalous surface and transparency as well as geometrical illusion. Along with line figures producing geometrical illusions, illusory surface figures inducing neon color spreading and transparency effects were used as test patterns. Participants made both of psychophysical judgments and of aesthetic judgments for the same test pattern. Both of geometrical illusions and aesthetic preferences were found to change similarly as a function of stimulus variables such as the number of filling lines and the size ratio of the inner and outer figural components. Also, following specific stimulus variables such as lightness contrast ratio and spatial interval between inducing figural elements (so called ``packmen''), strong effects of color spreading and transparency were accompanied with strong preferences. It seems that the paradigm to investigate aesthetic phenomena along with perceptual dimensions is useful to bridge the gap between experimental phenomenology and experimental aesthetics.|
|Keywords||aesthetic preference anomalous (subjective) surface experimental (empirical) aesthetics experimental phenomenology perceived transparency visual illusion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kiyohiro Maeda, Hiroki Yamamoto, Masaki Fukunaga, Masahior Umeda, Chuzo Tanaka & Yoshimichi Ejima (2010). Neural Correlates of Color-Selective Metacontrast in Human Early Retinotopic Areas. Journal of Neurophysiology 104:2291-2301.
Robert I. Reynolds (1988). A Psychological Definition of Illusion. Philosophical Psychology 1 (2):217-223.
Frederick Burwick & Walter Pape (eds.) (1990). Aesthetic Illusion: Theoretical and Historical Approaches. W. De Gruyter.
Jonathan Cohen (2002). The Grand Grand Illusion Illusion. Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (5-6):141-157.
Paul Tibbetts (1969). Perception; Selected Readings in Science and Phenomenology. Chicago, Quadrangle Books.
Joel Norman (2001). Two Visual Systems and Two Theories of Perception: An Attempt to Reconcile the Constructivist and Ecological Approaches. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):73-96.
Yann Coello & Yves Rossetti (2004). Planning and Controlling Action in a Structured Environment: Visual Illusion Without Dorsal Stream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):29-31.
Casey O'Callaghan (2008). Seeing What You Hear: Cross-Modal Illusions and Perception. Philosophical Issues 18 (1):316-338.
Carmelo Calì (2008). Experimental Phenomenology in Contemporary Perception Science. Teorie E Modelli 13 (1/2).
Rolf Reber, Norbert Schwarz & Piotr Winkielman (2004). Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (4):364-382.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #48,094 of 722,947 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,947 )
How can I increase my downloads?