Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):667 - 673 (2007)
|Abstract||I argue that Graham Priest's story 'Sylvan's Box' has an attractive consistent reading. Priest's hope that this story can be used as an example of a non-trivial 'essentially inconsistent' story is thus threatened. I then make some observations about the role 'Sylvan's Box' might play in a theory of unreliable narrators|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert R. Ulmer & Timothy L. Sellnow (2000). Consistent Questions of Ambiguity in Organizational Crisis Communication: Jack in the Box as a Case Study. Journal of Business Ethics 25 (2):143 - 155.
Mario Bunge (1963). A General Black Box Theory. Philosophy of Science 30 (4):346-358.
Richard Sylvan (1997). Transcendental Metaphysics: From Radical to Deep Plurallism [Sic]. White Horse Press.
David Papineau (2003). Why You Don’T Want to Get in the Box with Schrödinger's Cat. Analysis 63 (277):51–58.
Graham Priest & Richard Sylvan (1992). Simplified Semantics for Basic Relevant Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 21 (2):217 - 232.
Graham Priest & Richard Sylvan (1989). Contradiction, Assertion and 'Frege's Point'. Analysis 49 (1):23 - 26.
Graham Priest (1999). Sylvan's Box: A Short Story and Ten Morals. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):573-582.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #40,771 of 548,970 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,970 )
How can I increase my downloads?