In defence of the indefensible: An alternative to John Paley's reductionist, atheistic, psychological alternative to spirituality
Nursing Philosophy 10 (3):203-213 (2009)
|Abstract||John Paley has rightly observed that, while spirituality is widely discussed in the nursing literature, the discussions are uncritical and unproblematic. In an effort 'to reconfigure the spirituality-in-nursing debate, and to position it where it belongs: in the literature on health psychology and social psychology, and not in a disciplinary cul-de-sac labelled "unfathomable mystery" ', Paley has proposed an alternative, reductionist approach to spirituality. In this paper, I identify two critiques developed by Paley: one political, the other 'logical'. Paley's political critique claims the concept of 'spirituality' has been appropriated by nursing theorists as part of an attempt to accrue professional power and jurisdiction over occupational territory. I suggest that Paley's analysis masks his own exclusivist, secularizing jurisdictional claim made at the expense of spirituality. Paley's so-called 'logical' critique is motivated by an intention to 'determine what the "spirituality" terrain looks like from the naturalistic point of view'. However, noting a number of inconsistencies, I challenge his 'logical move' as a naïve attack on a straw man. In place of Paley's reductionism, I propose my own alternative alternative and argue (after Foucault) that 'spirituality' is a discourse, a non-reductionist attempt, in a post-religious society, to speak about the human condition open to the unknown. I conclude with a definition and a description of empirically congruent spirituality.|
|Keywords||secularism Paley Foucault non‐religious spirituality discourse spirituality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Graham Oppy (2002). Paley's Argument for Design. Philo 5 (2):161-173.
J. D. Iii (2008). Comments on 'Spirituality and Nursing: A Reductionist Approach' by John Paley. Nursing Philosophy 9 (3):214–217.
Barbara Pesut (2008). A Reply to 'Spirituality and Nursing: A Reductionist Approach' by John Paley. Nursing Philosophy 9 (2):131-137.
Robert W. Newsom (2008). Comments on 'Spirituality and Nursing: A Reductionist Approach' by John Paley. Nursing Philosophy 9 (3):214-217.
Carlo Leget (2008). Spirituality and Nursing: Why Be Reductionist? A Response to John Paley. Nursing Philosophy 9 (4):277-278.
M. A. Paley (2008). Spirituality and Nursing: A Reductionist Approach. Nursing Philosophy 9 (1):3–18.
John Paley (2010). Spirituality and Reductionism: Three Replies. Nursing Philosophy 11 (3):178-190.
Trevor Hussey (2009). Nursing and Spirituality. Nursing Philosophy 10 (2):71-80.
M. A. Paley (2008). Spirituality and Nursing: A Reply to Barbara Pesut. Nursing Philosophy 9 (2):138–140.
R. N. PhD (2008). A Reply to 'Spirituality and Nursing: A Reductionist Approach' by John Paley. Nursing Philosophy 9 (2):131–137.
Added to index2009-06-11
Total downloads13 ( #95,541 of 722,856 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?