David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 37 (1):3 – 43 (1994)
Foucault appears to challenge traditional views of truth, reason, and knowledge in the doctrine of power/knowledge developed in his post?1970 writings. This doctrine applies to all the sciences (and to non?scientific and non?discursive practices that are not discussed here). Foucault's notions of discourse (1) and power (3) are sufficiently discussed to set out his explanatory theory of the cause of our discourses and their change. In (4) three theses concerning the power/knowledge link are distinguished, of which the more important is called the ?Primacy Thesis?, namely the causal priority of power over knowledge. Various formulations of this thesis are investigated, some of which are contrasted with Francis Bacon's more plausible account of the link between power and knowledge. In (5), six criticisms of the thesis are discussed. Foucault's notion of truth is explored on the way, more particularly in (6). The outcome of the discussion is that Foucault's doctrine of power/knowledge, apart from some insights for an empirically based sociological investigation into the causes of some of our scientific beliefs, is generally false; for philosophical theories of truth and knowledge it has nothing to say. In fact if Foucault is to be a critic of the beliefs which circulate as a result of power, he needs the traditional account of truth and knowledge
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
R. Nola & G. Irzik (2003). Incredulity Towards Lyotard: A Critique of a Postmodernist Account of Science and Knowledge. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):391-421.
Similar books and articles
Lotar Rasiński (2011). Power, Discourse, and Subject. The Case of Laclau and Foucault. Polish Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):117-136.
Grant Gillett (1995). Virtue and Truth in Clinical Science. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (3):285-298.
Geoff Danaher (2000). Understanding Foucault. Sage Publications.
Ellen K. Feder (2004). The Discursive Production of the “Dangerous Individual”. Radical Philosophy Review 7 (1):17-39.
Kathleen Ennis, Michel Foucault and Judith Butler: Troubling Butler's Appropriation of Foucault's Work.
Wolfgang Detel (2005). Foucault and Classical Antiquity: Power, Ethics, and Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Chia-Ling Wang (2011). Power/Knowledge for Educational Theory: Stephen Ball and the Reception of Foucault. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (1):141-156.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads14 ( #163,935 of 1,696,615 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #250,163 of 1,696,615 )
How can I increase my downloads?