David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 45 (3):317 - 350 (1980)
Tensions between idealism and scientific realism have been resolved by an appeal to the theory/observation distinction. but many who support incommensurability reject the distinction in favor of a version of idealism, e.g., thomas kuhn who supports a version of relativist idealism in which the terms of a theory do refer, but only to a paradigm--relative world of entities. it is argued that the three kinds of idealism depend on a cluster theory of meaning for fixing the reference of scientific terms, and that a realist interpretation of the growth of science must eschew such a theory of meaning. the kripke-putnam theory for reference fixing of theoretical terms is employed to show how one term, 'mass', is referentially invariant despite change in the theory of motion from newton to einstein
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David Malet Armstrong (1978). A Theory of Universals. Universals and Scientific Realism Volume Ii. Cambridge University Press.
John Earman & Arthur Fine (1977). Against Indeterminacy. Journal of Philosophy 74 (9):535-538.
Paul Feyerabend (1970). Consolations for the Specialist1. In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press. 197.
Hartry Field (1973). Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference. Journal of Philosophy 70 (14):462-481.
Citations of this work BETA
Dieter Freundlieb (1987). Hermeneutics and Semantics. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 18 (1-2):110-133.
Similar books and articles
Elaine Mates (1973). Paradox Lost-Majority Rule Regained. Ethics 84 (1):48-50.
Willem A. deVries (2009). Getting Beyond Idealisms. In Willem A. DeVries (ed.), Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars. Oxford University Press.
Robert Nicol Cross (1945). Idealism and Realism. London, the Lindsey Press.
John Foster (2008). A World for Us: The Case for Phenomenalistic Idealism. Oxford University Press.
Mark Basil Tanzer (1998). Heidegger on Realism and Idealism. Journal of Philosophical Research 23:95-111.
Tronn Overend (1978). Social Realism and Social Idealism: Two Competing Orientations on the Relation Between Theory, Praxis, and Objectivity. Inquiry 21 (1-4):271 – 311.
Panos Theodorou (2004). Of the Same in the Different. What is Wrong with Kuhn's Use of ``Seeing'' and ``Seeing As''. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 35 (1):175-200.
Wouter de Been (2008). Legal Realism Regained: Saving Realism From Critical Acclaim. Stanford Law Books.
Chris Stevenson & Ian Beech (2001). Paradigms Lost, Paradigms Regained: Defending Nursing Against a Single Reading of Postmodernism. Nursing Philosophy 2 (2):143-150.
Curtis Brown (1988). Internal Realism: Transcendental Idealism? Midwest Studies in Philosophy 12 (1):145-155.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads64 ( #29,796 of 1,692,674 )
Recent downloads (6 months)26 ( #6,837 of 1,692,674 )
How can I increase my downloads?