Philosophical Studies 84 (2-3):239 - 262 (1996)
|Abstract||This paper discusses the principle of recombination for possible worlds. It argues that arguments against unrestricted recombination offered by Forrest and Armstrong and by David Lewis fail, but a related argument is a challenge, and recommends that we accept an unrestricted principle of recombination and the conclusion that possible worlds form a proper class.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Holly Gail Thomas (1995). The Principle of Recombination and the Principle of Distinctness: A Puzzle for Armstrong's Theory of Modality. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (3):444 – 457.
Ryan Wasserman, Recombination, Causal Constraints and Humean Supervenience: An Argument for Temporal Parts?
Klaus Jaffe (2000). Emergence and Maintenance of Sex Among Diploid Organisms Aided by Assortative Mating. Acta Biotheoretica 48 (2).
Frank Hofmann (2006). Truthmaking, Recombination, and Facts Ontology. Philosophical Studies 128 (2):409-440.
Theodore Sider (2009). Williamson's Many Necessary Existents. Analysis 69 (2):250-258.
David Efird (2008). What is the Principle of Recombination? Dialectica 62 (4):483-494.
Ross P. Cameron (2008). Recombination and Intrinsicality. Ratio 21 (1):1–12.
George Darby & Duncan Watson (2010). Lewis's Principle of Recombination: Reply to Efird and Stoneham. Dialectica 64 (3):435-445.
John S. Wilkins (2007). The Concept and Causes of Microbial Species. Studies in History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 28 (3):389-408.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads82 ( #11,433 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #14,877 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?