David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 31 (2):135-154 (2009)
Moves from is to good—that is, principles that link fact to value—are fundamental to environmental ethics. The upshot is fourfold: (1) for nonanthropogenic goods, only those moves from is to good are defensible which conceive goodness as goodness for biotic entities; (2) goodness for nonsentient biotic entities is contribution to their autopoietic functioning; (3) biotic entities also function “exopoietically” to benefit related entities, and these exopoietic benefits are on average greater than their own goods; and (4) the most general is-to-good principles that are defensible (and hence the ones of greatest importance for environmental ethics) concern a realm of nonanthropogenic goodness that encompasses both living and nonliving nature
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ronald Sandler (2012). Is Artefactualness a Value-Relevant Property of Living Things? Synthese 185 (1):89-102.
Similar books and articles
John Nolt (2006). The Move From Good to Ought in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 28 (4):355-374.
Christopher V. Mirus (2012). Order and the Determinate. Review of Metaphysics 65 (3):499-523.
Imtiaz Moosa (2002). Does the Failure of Utilitarianism Justify a Belief in Intrinsic Value? Philo 5 (2):123-142.
Amelie Oksenberg Rorty (2011). The Goodness of Searching: Good as What? Good for What? Good for Whom? In Ruth Weissbourd Grant (ed.), In Search of Goodness. University of Chicago Press.
John Nolt (2010). Hope, Self-Transcendence and Environmental Ethics. Inquiry 53 (2):162 – 182.
Geoffrey B. Frasz (2001). What is Environmental Virtue Ethics That We Should Be Mindful of It? Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (2):5-14.
James F. O'Brien (1988). Teilhard's View of Nature and Some Implications for Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 10 (4):329-346.
Ronald Sandler (2003). The External Goods Approach to Environmental Virtue Ethics. Environmental Ethics 25 (3):279-293.
Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (1992). The Good Life and the Human Good. Cambridge University Press.
Delio (2009). Is Creation Really Good? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (1):3 - 22.
Aaron Simmons (2010). Two Arguments Against Biological Interests. Environmental Ethics 32 (3):229-245.
Claus Beisbart (2012). Varieties of Goodness at Work: The Relationship Between Business and Morality. Inquiry 55 (4):405-430.
John Mizzoni (2004). St. Francis, Paul Taylor, and Franciscan Biocentrism. Environmental Ethics 26 (1):41-56.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads4 ( #272,677 of 1,140,333 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,127 of 1,140,333 )
How can I increase my downloads?