Modernization, rights, and democratic society: The limits of Habermas's democratic theory [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Res Publica 11 (2):101-123 (2005)
Jürgen Habermas’s discourse-theoretic reconstruction of the normative foundations of democracy assumes the formal separation of democratic political practice from the economic system. Democratic autonomy presupposes a vital public sphere protected by a complex schedule of individual rights. These rights are supposed to secure the formal and material conditions for democratic freedom. However, because Habermas argues that the economy must be left to function according to endogenous market dynamics, he accepts as a condition of democracy (the formal separation of spheres) a social structure that is in fact anti-democratic. The value of self-determination that Habermas’s theory of democracy presupposes is contradicted by the actual operations of capitalist markets. Further democratic development demands that the steering mechanisms of the capitalist market be challenged by self-organizing civic movements.
|Keywords||capitalist market democracy Habermas public sphere rights self-determination self-organizing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Guido Palazzo & Andreas Georg Scherer (2006). Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):71 - 88.
Guido Palazzo & Andreas Georg Scherer (2006). Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):71-88.
Elsa González, José Felix Lozano & Pedro Jesús Pérez (2009). Beyond the Conflict: Religion in the Public Sphere and Deliberative Democracy. Res Publica 15 (3):251-267.
Similar books and articles
Denise Vitale (2006). Between Deliberative and Participatory Democracy: A Contribution on Habermas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (6):739-766.
Corey Brettschneider (2007). Democratic Rights: The Substance of Self-Government. Princeton University Press.
Joshua Cohen (2010). The Arc of the Moral Universe and Other Essays. Harvard University Press.
Deborah Cook (2001). Habermas on Reason and Revolution. Continental Philosophy Review 34 (3):321-338.
Georgia Warnke (2000). Feminism and Democratic Deliberation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (3):61-74.
Jonathan Bowman (2007). Challenging Habermas' Response to the European Union Democratic Deficit. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):736-755.
Corey Brettschneider (2006). The Value Theory of Democracy. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (3):259-278.
David Plotke (2006). Democratic Polities and Anti-Democratic Politics. Theoria 53 (111):6-44.
John S. Brady (2004). No Contest? Assessing the Agonistic Critiques of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (3):331-354.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #127,217 of 1,796,307 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,135 of 1,796,307 )
How can I increase my downloads?