Modernization, rights, and democratic society: The limits of Habermas's democratic theory [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Res Publica 11 (2):101-123 (2005)
|Abstract||Jürgen Habermas’s discourse-theoretic reconstruction of the normative foundations of democracy assumes the formal separation of democratic political practice from the economic system. Democratic autonomy presupposes a vital public sphere protected by a complex schedule of individual rights. These rights are supposed to secure the formal and material conditions for democratic freedom. However, because Habermas argues that the economy must be left to function according to endogenous market dynamics, he accepts as a condition of democracy (the formal separation of spheres) a social structure that is in fact anti-democratic. The value of self-determination that Habermas’s theory of democracy presupposes is contradicted by the actual operations of capitalist markets. Further democratic development demands that the steering mechanisms of the capitalist market be challenged by self-organizing civic movements.|
|Keywords||capitalist market democracy Habermas public sphere rights self-determination self-organizing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Denise Vitale (2006). Between Deliberative and Participatory Democracy: A Contribution on Habermas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (6):739-766.
David Plotke (2006). Democratic Polities and Anti-Democratic Politics. Theoria 53 (111):6-44.
Corey Brettschneider (2006). The Value Theory of Democracy. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (3):259-278.
Jonathan Bowman (2007). Challenging Habermas' Response to the European Union Democratic Deficit. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):736-755.
Georgia Warnke (2000). Feminism and Democratic Deliberation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (3):61-74.
Deborah Cook (2001). Habermas on Reason and Revolution. Continental Philosophy Review 34 (3):321-338.
Joshua Cohen (2010). The Arc of the Moral Universe and Other Essays. Harvard University Press.
Corey Brettschneider (2007). Democratic Rights: The Substance of Self-Government. Princeton University Press.
John S. Brady (2004). No Contest? Assessing the Agonistic Critiques of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (3):331-354.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #62,772 of 739,393 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,393 )
How can I increase my downloads?