Sungho Choi and the ‘actual events’ clause

Analysis 62 (1):46–47 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In order to keep matters brief, I shall assume knowledge of my Mind paper and Sungho Choi’s paper printed before this brief response (Noordhof 1999; Choi 2002). Sungho Choi claims that the example I gave to motivate my formulation of the ‘actual events’ clause fails to motivate it and that the formulation, in fact, contains a redundant element, namely my appeal to supersets. I think he is right that my example doesn’t work. However, I think he is wrong that the actual events clause contains a redundant element. The second case he discusses provides the motivation we need.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
152 (#119,815)

6 months
19 (#123,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Noordhof
University of York

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations