The Only X and Y Principle

Analysis 45 (2):79 - 83 (1985)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/45.1.79
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 20,914
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Heather Demarest (2015). Fission May Kill You. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (3).
Katherine Hawley (2005). Fission, Fusion and Intrinsic Facts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):602-621.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Michael Strevens (1995). A Closer Look at the 'New' Principle. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):545-561.
Nils Holtug (2002). The Harm Principle. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
Crispin Wright (2001). Is Hume's Principle Analytic? In Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (eds.), Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Oxford University Press 307-333.
Murali Ramachandran (2005). Williamson’s Argument Against the KK-Principle 157. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 1.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-05-29

Total downloads

123 ( #31,039 of 1,907,911 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

57 ( #9,189 of 1,907,911 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.