David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (3):660–665 (2008)
The main idea of this book is that perceiving is a way of acting. Perception is not something that happens to us, or in us. It is something we do. Think of a blind person taptapping his or her way around a cluttered space, perceiving that space by touch, not all at once, but through time, by skillful probing and movement. This is, or at least ought to be, our paradigm of what perceiving is. The world makes itself available to the perceiver through physical movement and interaction. In this book I argue that all perception is touch-like in this way: perceptual experience acquires content thanks to our possession of bodily skills. What we perceive is determined by what we do (or what we know how to do); it is determined by what we are ready to do. In ways I try to make precise, we enact our perceptual experience; we act it out.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Julius Schönherr (forthcoming). What’s so Special About Interaction in Social Cognition? Review of Philosophy and Psychology:1-18.
Similar books and articles
Alva Noë (2005). Action in Perception. The MIT Press.
Ryan Hickerson (2007). Perception as Knowing How to Act: Alva Noë's Action in Perception. Philosophical Psychology 20 (4):505 – 517.
Shaun Gallagher (2005). Review of Alva Noë's Action in Perception. [REVIEW] Times Literary Supplement.
A. D. Smith (2001). Perception and Belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):283-309.
Bill Brewer (2001). Review: Précis of Perception and Reason. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):405 - 416.
M. G. F. Martin (2008). Commentary on Action in Perception. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (3):674–681.
Mohan Matthen (2006). Review: Action in Perception. [REVIEW] Mind 115 (460):1160-1166.
Alva Noë (2007). Understanding Action in Perception: Replies to Hickerson and Keijzer. Philosophical Psychology 20 (4):531 – 538.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads191 ( #11,339 of 1,777,915 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #169,156 of 1,777,915 )
How can I increase my downloads?