|Abstract||Inductive generalization asserts that what obtains in known instances can be generalized to all. Its original form is enumerative induction, the earliest form of inductive inference, and it has been elaborated in various ways, largely with the goal of extending its reach. Its principal problem is that it supplies no intrinsic notion of strength of support so that one cannot tell if the generalization has weak or strong support|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Daniel J. Navarro, Matthew J. Dry & Michael D. Lee (2012). Sampling Assumptions in Inductive Generalization. Cognitive Science 36 (2):187-223.
John D. Norton (2003). A Material Theory of Induction. Philosophy of Science 70 (4):647-670.
John D. Norton, The Inductive Significance of Observationally Indistinguishable Spacetimes: (Peter Achinstein has the Last Laugh).
Romeyn, J.-W. (2004). Hypotheses and Inductive Predictions. Synthese 141 (3):333-364.
Ilkka Niiniluoto (1972). Inductive Systematization: Definition and a Critical Survey. Synthese 25 (1-2):25 - 81.
Theo A. F. Kuipers (1973). A Generalization of Carnap's Inductive Logic. Synthese 25 (3-4):334 - 336.
H. Clark Barrett (2001). On the Functional Origins of Essentialism. [Journal (Paginated)] (in Press) 2 (1):1-30.
David H. Sanford (1990). The Inductive Support of Inductive Rules: Themes From Max Black. Dialectica 44 (1‐2):23-41.
Jan-Willem Romeijn (2004). Hypotheses and Inductive Predictions. Synthese 141 (3):333 - 364.
John Norton (2010). Deductively Definable Logies of Induction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (6):617 - 654.
Jaakko Hintikka (ed.) (1975). Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives. D. Reidel Pub. Co..
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads13 ( #95,541 of 722,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,863 )
How can I increase my downloads?