David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Polish Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):51-72 (2009)
Alain Badiou is a highly original, indeed decidedly iconoclastic thinker whose work has ranged widely over areas of equal concern to philosophers in the ‘continental’ and mainstream analytic traditions. These areas include ontology, epistemology, ethics, politics, and – above all – philosophy of mathematics. It is unfortunate, and symptomatic of prevailing attitudes, that his work has so far receivedminimal attention from commentators in the analytic line of descent. Here I try to help the process of reception along by describing Badiou’s remarkably ambitious approach to issues of mathematical (more specifically: of set-theoretical) ontology, and by explaining just where his project stands in relation to some major issues within current analytic debate. Chief among them are: the issue between realists and anti-realists – along with various avowed middle-ground or compromise solutions – and those oddly tenacious problems-from-Wittgenstein (e.g., concerning what it means to follow a rule) that have so preoccupied philosophers over the past decade. In particular I stress the unusual, indeed unique combination in his thought of high formal rigour and conceptual clarity allied to a speculative scope and inventiveness which tend to make those other discussions appear somewhat self-absorbed and parochial. Most importantly, Badiou engages these issues at a level of creative as well as of technical or analytic grasp, which puts his thinking closely in touch with the way that set theory has itself evolved through a constant process of – in Badiou’s phrase – ‘turning paradoxes into concepts.’ I also discuss his strong and principled rejection of the ‘linguistic turn’ in its manifold (analytic and continental) variants, and his idea of the ‘event’ as that which inherently eludes or surpasses the conceptual resources of any received ontology, whether in mathematics and the natural sciences or in the history of genuinely epochal changes in politics and ethics. All in all, I put the case for Badiou as a thinker of the first importance not only for the impressive range, depth and originality of his work, but also because it points to an escape-route from some of the more cramped or windowless quarters of present-day philosophic thought
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Zachary Fraser (2007). The Law of the Subject: Alain Badiou, Luitzen Brouwer and the Kripkean Analyses of Forcing and the Heyting Calculus. Cosmos & History 2 (1):92-133.
Jamie Morgan (2011). The Significance of the Mathematics of Infinity for Realism: Norris on Badiou. Journal of Critical Realism 10 (2):243-270.
Paul M. Livingston (2009). Review of Alain Badiou, Logics of Worlds: Being and Event Ii. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (10).
Paul Livingston (2012). Badiou and the Consequences of Formalism. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 8 (1):131-150.
Ray Brassier (2006). Presentation as Anti-Phenomenon in Alain Badiou's Being and Event. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (1):59-77.
Taylor Hammer (2007). The Role of Ontology in the Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):57-77.
Simon B. Duffy (2012). Badiou’s Platonism: The Mathematical Ideas of Post-Cantorian Set-Theory. In Sean Bowden & Simon B. Duffy (eds.), Badiou and Philosophy. Edinburgh University Press.
Jeff Love & Todd May (2008). From Universality to Inequality. Symposium 12 (2):51-69.
John Kadvany (2008). Review of Alain Badiou, Number and Numbers. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (10).
David Fiorovanti (2012). Badiou Versus Derrida: Truth, Sets, and Sophistry. Philosophical Forum 43 (1):51-64.
Margus Vihalem (2011). What is 'the Subject' the Name For? The Conceptual Structure of Alain Badiou's Theory of the Subject. Sign Systems Studies 39 (1):60-79.
Sean Bowden & Simon B. Duffy (eds.) (2012). Badiou and Philosophy. Edinburgh University Press.
Nancy Billias (2010). Ingarden and Badiou. Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):49-61.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads7 ( #149,815 of 1,089,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?