Building Receptivity: Leopold's Land Ethic and Critical Feminist Interpretation

Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 5 (4):493-512 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aldo Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac emphasizes values of receptivity and perceptivity that appear to be mutually reinforcing, critical to an ecological conscience, and cultivatable through concrete and embodied experience. His priorities bear striking similarities to elements of the ethics of care elaborated by feminist philosophers, especially Nel Noddings, who notably recommended receptivity, direct and personal experience, and even shared Leopold’s attentiveness to joy and play as sources of moral motivation. These commonalities are so fundamental that ecofeminists can and should see Leopold as a philosophical ally. The three ecofeminist scholars who have devoted the most concerted attention to Leopold’s work argue that his Land Ethic is not, and does not provide a basis for, an ecofeminist ethic. I dispute the main criticisms of these scholars, and conclude that ecofeminists should attend more often to Leopold’s work, which extends possibilities for excellent praxis.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-29

Downloads
984 (#12,586)

6 months
124 (#24,385)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kathryn J. Norlock
Trent University

Citations of this work

Perpetual Struggle.Kathryn J. Norlock - 2018 - Hypatia 34 (1):6-19.
Environmental Ethics: The State of the Question.Marion Hourdequin - 2021 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 59 (3):270-308.

Add more citations