David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):231 – 252 (2007)
The duality of truth and falsity in a Boolean algebra of propositions is used to generate a duality of belief and disbelief. To each additive probability measure that represents belief there corresponds a dual additive measure that represents disbelief. The dual measure has its own peculiar calculus, in which, for example, measures are added when propositions are combined under conjunction. A Venn diagram of the measure has the contradiction as its total space. While additive measures are not self-dual, the epistemic state of complete ignorance is represented by the unique, monotonic, non-additive measure that is self-dual in its contingent propositions. Convex sets of additive measures fail to represent complete ignorance since they are not self-dual.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Glenn Shafer (1976). A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press.
Alan Hájek (2003). What Conditional Probability Could Not Be. Synthese 137 (3):273--323.
John D. Norton (2003). A Material Theory of Induction. Philosophy of Science 70 (4):647-670.
Oron Shagrir, John D. Norton, Holger Andreas, Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen, Aris Spanos, Eckhart Arnold, Elliott Sober, Peter Gildenhuys & Adela Helena Roszkowski (2010). 1. Marr on Computational-Level Theories Marr on Computational-Level Theories (Pp. 477-500). Philosophy of Science 77 (4).
Gerald J. Massey (1992). The Indeterminacy of Translation: A Study in Philosophical Exegesis. Philosophical Topics 20 (1):317-345.
Citations of this work BETA
John Norton (2008). Ignorance and Indifference. Philosophy of Science 75 (1):45-68.
Yann Benétreau-Dupin (2015). The Bayesian Who Knew Too Much. Synthese 192 (5):1527-1542.
John D. Norton (2010). Cosmic Confusions: Not Supporting Versus Supporting Not. Philosophy of Science 77 (4):501-523.
J. Michael Dunn (2010). Contradictory Information: Too Much of a Good Thing. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (4):425 - 452.
John Norton (2010). Deductively Definable Logies of Induction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (6):617 - 654.
Similar books and articles
John C. Bigelow (1979). Quantum Probability in Logical Space. Philosophy of Science 46 (2):223-243.
Giovanni Sambin (1999). Subdirectly Irreducible Modal Algebras and Initial Frames. Studia Logica 62 (2):269-282.
Tomoji Shogenji (2012). The Degree of Epistemic Justification and the Conjunction Fallacy. Synthese 184 (1):29-48.
Chunlai Zhou (2010). Probability Logic of Finitely Additive Beliefs. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (3):247-282.
Kenneth S. Pope (1991). Dual Roles and Sexual Intimacies in Psychotherapy: Dual Relationships in Psychotherapy. Ethics and Behavior 1 (1):21 – 34.
Piotr Zakrzewski (1988). On Universal Semiregular Invariant Measures. Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (4):1170-1176.
David Ellerman (2010). The Logic of Partitions: Introduction to the Dual of the Logic of Subsets. Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (2):287-350.
G. Schurz & H. Leitgeb (2008). Finitistic and Frequentistic Approximation of Probability Measures with or Without Σ -Additivity. Studia Logica 89 (2):257 - 283.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #88,928 of 1,796,539 )
Recent downloads (6 months)23 ( #32,302 of 1,796,539 )
How can I increase my downloads?