David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Derrida Today 3 (2):178-200 (2010)
In this essay I set out to place Derrida's work – especially his earlier (pre-1980) books and essays – in the context of related or contrasting developments in analytic philosophy of science over the past half-century. Along the way I challenge the various misconceptions that have grown up around that work, not only amongst its routine detractors in the analytic camp but also amongst some of its less philosophically informed disciples. In particular I focus on the interlinked issues of realism versus anti-realism and the scope and limits of classical (bivalent) logic, both of which receive a detailed, rigorous and sustained treatment in his deconstructive readings of Husserl, Austin and others. Contrary to Derrida's reputation as a exponent of anti-realism in its far-gone ‘textualist’ form and as one who merely plays perverse though ingenious games with logic I show that those readings presuppose both a basically realist conception of their subject-matter and a strong commitment to the protocols of bivalent logic. These he applies with the utmost care and precision right up to the point – unreachable except by way of that procedure – where they encounter certain problems or anomalies that cannot be resolved except by switching to a different (non-bivalent, deviant, paraconsistent, ‘supplementary’, or ‘parergonal’) logic. Philosophy of science in the analytic mainstream might benefit greatly from a closer acquaintance with Derrida's thinking on these topics, as it might from a knowledge of his likewise rigorous thinking-through of the antinomy between structure and genesis as it bears upon issues in the history of scientific thought.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
William P. Alston (1996). A Realist Conception of Truth. Cornell University Press.
A. J. Ayer (ed.) (1978). Logical Positivism. Greenwood Press.
Paul Benacerraf & Hilary Putnam (eds.) (1983). Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings. Cambridge University Press.
Richard Boyd (1984). Scientific Realism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 21 (1&2):767-791.
Jacques Derrida (1982). Dissemination. University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Samuel C. Wheeler (2000). Deconstruction as Analytic Philosophy. Stanford University Press.
Martin McQuillan (ed.) (2007). The Politics of Deconstruction: Jacques Derrida and the Other of Philosophy. Pluto Press.
Tim Crane (2012). Philosophy, Logic, Science, History. Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):20-37.
Susan Haack (1996). Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism. University of Chicago Press.
Fred Seymour Michael (2002). Entailment and Bivalence. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (4):289-300.
Joshua Kates (2008). Fielding Derrida: Philosophy, Literary Criticism, History, and the Work of Deconstruction. Fordham University Press.
Roy T. Cook (2014). Should Anti-Realists Be Anti-Realists About Anti-Realism? Erkenntnis 79 (2):233-258.
Martin McQuillan (2008). Derrida and Policy: Is Deconstruction Really a Social Science? Derrida Today 5 (1):119-130.
P. D. Magnus (2013). Philosophy of Science in the Twenty-First Century. Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):48-52.
Angelo M. Petroni (1993). Conventionalism, Scientific Discovery and the Sociology of Knowledge. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (3):225 – 240.
James Chase (2010). Analytic Versus Continental: Arguments on the Methods and Value of Philosophy. Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
David Roden (2005). Naturalising Deconstruction. Continental Philosophy Review 38 (1-2):71-88.
Christopher Norris (2004). Philosophy of Language and the Challenge to Scientific Realism. Routledge.
Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2010). Some Uses of Logic in Rigorous Philosophy. Axiomathes 20 (2-3):385-398.
John Bell & Michael Hallett (1982). Logic, Quantum Logic and Empiricism. Philosophy of Science 49 (3):355-379.
Added to index2010-11-11
Total downloads24 ( #80,923 of 1,413,409 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #94,438 of 1,413,409 )
How can I increase my downloads?